Re: [Geotools-devel] Simplifying filters (avoiding WHERE 1=1 queries...)

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
I found your bug report on the topic: - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1941 Thanks for working on a visitor to perform simplifications; it is exactly what I had in mind for this issue. Andrea Aime wrote: > The class is SimplyfingFilterVisitor, I've added tests, > used it in the two sql enc

[Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 Released

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
The GeoTools 2.5-M3 milestone release is available for download: * http://geotools.codehaus.org/2.5-M3 The GeoTools 2.5 series has been updated to use *Java 5*, and has undergone many improvements. This release is centred around making a new Feature model available. The new feature model is

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 assembly

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote: > I am going to go back to trying a specific 2.1 of > this plugin and see if we can get a release. This is my last idea on > this one so suggestions are welcome. > This idea worked; no idea why non version 2.1 is fatal; but moving on ... The db2 and sde dummy modules are n

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 deployed, but not released

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote: >> Comparing to 2.4.x we do in fact have no assembly information on the >> 2.5.x branch... on 2.4.x we have: >> > This missing bit of xml here: > - http://svn.geotools.org/tags/2.5-M2/pom.xml > - http://svn.geotools.org/tags/2.5-M1/pom.xml > > I don't see a record of why i

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 deployed, but not released

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote: > Calling the "mvn assembly:assembly" target results in the following: > >> [INFO] [assembly:assembly] >> [INFO] >> >> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR >> [INFO] >> -

[Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 deployed, but not released

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Calling the "mvn assembly:assembly" target results in the following: > [INFO] [assembly:assembly] > [INFO] > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > > [INFO]

[Geotools-devel] 2.5-M3 deployed

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
2.5-M3 is deployed and released in Jira. This release has a nice solid dependency on geoapi-2.2-M1. I am going to try the following: - messing around with the scripts to make an artifact; see if I can strip the unsupported modules into a separate download as per discussion on user list. - packag

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Andrea Aime wrote: >>> I'm sorry for this. I actually spent a weekend trying to make trunk >>> ready for 2.5.x branching, but then someone (Martin?) said it was not >>> urgent because you had your own Mercurial repo and so I just gave >>> up tryin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread johann.sorel
Jody Garnett a écrit : > johann.sorel wrote: >> Finally the time has came, better later than never. The Style patch >> for 2.6.x will be applyed tomorrow (05/08/08) between 17H and 18H >> GMT+1 . >> > Johann and I talked on IRC for a bit; this time will work out; I will > arrange a work party o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> I'm sorry for this. I actually spent a weekend trying to make trunk >> ready for 2.5.x branching, but then someone (Martin?) said it was not >> urgent because you had your own Mercurial repo and so I just gave up >> trying (and then I went away fo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
johann.sorel wrote: > Finally the time has came, better later than never. The Style patch > for 2.6.x will be applyed tomorrow (05/08/08) between 17H and 18H GMT+1 . > Johann and I talked on IRC for a bit; this time will work out; I will arrange a work party on this end to try and handle things.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > I'm sorry for this. I actually spent a weekend trying to make trunk > ready for 2.5.x branching, but then someone (Martin?) said it was not > urgent because you had your own Mercurial repo and so I just gave up > trying (and then I went away for vacation). > The streaming re

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Andrea Aime
johann.sorel ha scritto: ... > This is a major patch on styles. Since my deadline is passed by more > than 3weeks now, I won't make the necessary fixes after the commit, I've > maintain the patch for a month on my free time, I cant take more on my > time for this. I'm sorry for this. I actually

Re: [Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
johann.sorel wrote: > This is a major patch on styles. Since my deadline is passed by more > than 3weeks now, I won't make the necessary fixes after the commit, > I've maintain the patch for a month on my free time, I cant take more > on my time for this. Hi Johann - I am trying to set up the Ge

[Geotools-devel] Work In Progress : 17H to 18H GMT+1 05_08_08

2008-08-04 Thread johann.sorel
Hello, Finally the time has came, better later than never. The Style patch for 2.6.x will be applyed tomorrow (05/08/08) between 17H and 18H GMT+1 . Here is the content of the patch : - Update GeoTools Style interface to extend GeoAPI's ( This include new functionnalities from OGC specification

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can we create a 2.5-M3 tag?

2008-08-04 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > I was expecting to produce a release candidate last week (we do so when > geoserver enters its release cycle). Actually my motivation was to create a tag before to process to some cleanup like JAXB annotations removal. Martin --