A couple things:
I'm uploading the exported user guide for you.
There's a step missing in the "how to cut a release" document, which is
to modify the file
modules/library/metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/factory/GeoTools.java
and set it the correct version number. I.e.:
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
All,
I've added a few new functions to the ObjectCache interface (and all
implementations):
* remove(Object key);
* getKeys();
We also updated couple of the implementations to clear the locks as well
as the cache on a call to the clear method.
This was done so we could make use of the Obje
pjackson a écrit :
> I noticed what appears to be a bug when projecting from UTM to Geographic
> coordinates (also tried projection to and from geographic yielding the same
> behavior).
>
> In ConcatenatedTransformDirect.transform(), there is a second transform that
> unnecessarily (?) swaps the x
Hi again,
I'm moving several classes involved in parsing geotiff tags/metadata from
the geotfiff plugin to the coverage module since I'm developing additional
coverage plugins which rely on geotiff/tiff tag parsing.
This change won't compromise the workings of neither the geotiff plugin, nor
the co
GeoTiff plugin's GeoTiffMetadata2CRSAdapter.getRasterToModel method doesn't
correctly handle ModelTransformationTag + RasterTypeGeoKey
---
Key: GEO
Ciao Adrian,
pelase, read below...
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are these hints?
>
> Both of these seem to be module configuration information not a 'hint'
> for factories. Have 'hints' really reached this level now?
Hints are used at GCE Readers
Porting gt-2.5 ImageMosaic plugin code to gt-2.4
Key: GEOT-2057
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2057
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: gc imagemosaic
Ok cool, sounds good, I will do up the announcement, thanks Gabriel.
-Justin
Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira escribió:
>> Hi Gabriel,
>>
>> How far did we get with releasing 2.5.0? Is it still sitting on
>> sourceforge waiting to be announced. My impression is that we were
>> going to
Justin Deoliveira escribió:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> How far did we get with releasing 2.5.0? Is it still sitting on
> sourceforge waiting to be announced. My impression is that we were
> going to re-release due to patches required by GeoServer?
I did the patching and uploaded to sf as told you in a pre
