Re: [Geotools-devel] RC1 scheduling

2011-01-25 Thread Jody Garnett
On 25/01/2011, at 4:11 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > There is no set date at this time. > > I may end up making in the next two weeks; depending on if I can hack around > the WFS + srsName change in 2.7-beta1. Would next week be suitable f

[Geotools-devel] Funded project to develop SWT Client code for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Mayo
Forgive me, I intended including a link with the earlier 'Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools' message: http://www.vworker.com/RentACoder/misc/BidRequests/ShowBidRequest.asp?lngBidRequestId=1585324 Cheers, Ian -- Special Off

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-25 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Very nice, +1 Kind regards, Joachim On 01/20/2011 06:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread one month ago has evolved int

Re: [Geotools-devel] Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Mayo
Hi all, I've just submitted a vWorker project advertising for somebody with the skills necessary to develop the SWT client. Clearly a mailing list member would stand a very strong chance of winning the project... My reduced risk in employing an existing GeoTools 'expert' would also allow me to co

Re: [Geotools-devel] RC1 scheduling

2011-01-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > 2 weeks? Seems a bit long for a release candidate to sit with no known > > bugs... what is it you have to hack around? > > If you're referring to GS RC1 there has been a few fixes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Mayo
Hi Mathieu, On 25 January 2011 13:18, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > The Geotools Swing components are pretty straightforward to embed in SWT: > > embedded = new Composite(parent, SWT.EMBEDDED | SWT.NO_BACKGROUND); > Frame frame = SWT_AWT.new_Frame(embedded); > mapPane = new JMapPane(new StreamingRende

Re: [Geotools-devel] Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Mathieu Baudier
>> I'm aware of uDig, but I don't need a full geospatial framework - my >> application contains most of the GIS capabilities I require, I just >> want the SWT equivalent of the Swing JMapPane in order to use the >> GeoTools renderer. The Geotools Swing components are pretty straightforward to embe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Jody Garnett
There have been a couple cross platform (swing and swt) toolkits built against geotools (you can see the wreckage on source forge here for example - http://giswidgets.sourceforge.net/ ). If that serves as a starting point; I am sure we would be open to a gt-swt module (in the same manner as the

[Geotools-devel] Lightweight SWT UI for GeoTools

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Mayo
[reposted - following successful registration] Hi, does anybody out there know of a lightweight SWT wrapper for GeoTools? I'm aware of uDig, but I don't need a full geospatial framework - my application contains most of the GIS capabilities I require, I just want the SWT equivalent of the Swing JM

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: getFeatureInfo - HTML with complex features

2011-01-25 Thread Jody Garnett
One thing you can do (do you control the html template that is looping over features?) You could add some logic to check if the iterator implements FeatureIterator and if so close it at the end? Jody On 25/01/2011, at 6:18 PM, Niels wrote: > This works fine, but what is a pity is that in theor

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: getFeatureInfo - HTML with complex features

2011-01-25 Thread Niels
This works fine, but what is a pity is that in theory there is no absolute guarantee that the iterator will be closed. It is possible to do a break inside a collection loop in your template, and not finishing with the last item. I don't see why you would do that with features, and it is not done

Re: [Geotools-devel] RC1 scheduling

2011-01-25 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > 2 weeks? Seems a bit long for a release candidate to sit with no known > bugs... what is it you have to hack around? If you're referring to GS RC1 there has been a few fixes in the meantime: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigato