Re: [Geotools-devel] confused about docs

2011-03-24 Thread Jody Garnett
I am going to get the content; and then try and make it consistent. I was also thinking: - javadoc - user (containing welcome, tutorials, and the module by module documentation) - - developer (containing our developer guide for the project) On glitch that is currently going on that I need a hand

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.7.0 Released

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Love your work Justin :) Michael On 25 March 2011 02:48, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > GeoTools 2.7.0 has been released and is now available for download: >   http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.7.0 > > Check out the blog for information about what is included in this release: >   http://ge

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] memory leak - XSD classes

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Niels wrote: > > Not sure I follow. Those preventer adapters should now allow the same > element or schema to be added more than once... so I am curious as to how > the back references are accumulating. So while maybe right away the objects > won't be deferenced

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] memory leak - XSD classes

2011-03-24 Thread Niels
Not sure I follow. Those preventer adapters should now allow the same element or schema to be added more than once... so I am curious as to how the back references are accumulating. So while maybe right away the objects won't be deferenced but eventually hey should be. Although if you are bui

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] memory leak - XSD classes

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Niels, On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Niels wrote: > Justin, > > I have been able to solve the problem with the GeoServerImpl instances > accumulating. I think this was a global problem, so that is good news. The > bad new however, was that it was only a minor improvement and it didn't >

Re: [Geotools-devel] notable stuff for 2.7.0 announcement

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Great, thanks Andrea. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here is what I came up with for the 2.7.0 blog post: > > http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=116830172286767929 > > Just from what I gathered

Re: [Geotools-devel] notable stuff for 2.7.0 announcement

2011-03-24 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > Here is what I came up with for the 2.7.0 blog post: > http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=116830172286767929 > Just from what I gathered wading through all the change logs for every 2.7.x > version to date. Let me know what I

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.7.0 Released

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
GeoTools 2.7.0 has been released and is now available for download: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.7.0 Check out the blog for information about what is included in this release: http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/ Or check out the release notes for the entire change log: http:/

[Geotools-devel] notable stuff for 2.7.0 announcement

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Here is what I came up with for the 2.7.0 blog post: http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=116830172286767929 Just from what I gathered wading through all the change logs for every 2.7.x version to date. Let me know what I missed. Thanks! -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http:/

Re: [Geotools-devel] confused about docs

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
ok cool, that is what i more or less thought. No worries, I will just upload the wiki as of now and once you are finished the docs just let me know and I can uploads those as well. As an aside... it would be good to adopt a more consistent doc naming convention for artifacts... the current one con

Re: [Geotools-devel] docs build setup

2011-03-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I don't remember actually doing this... svn blame points to jody. But it makes sense because if we kept it projcet.version links on the website would link to downloads with SNAPSHOT versions, which we don't have. Unless we only generated the website from a tag... which we don't currently do. But M

Re: [Geotools-devel] docs build setup

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody > It is supposed to indicate the last stable release; so the website docs > should match the latest thing you can download. So why isn't it always set to ${project.version} ? Michael -- Enable your software for

Re: [Geotools-devel] confused about docs

2011-03-24 Thread Jody Garnett
The docs should be able to work for either; if you want to grab a copy you can. They are a couple of days away from being finished (just made it through referencing, coverage is next, and then the rest should be easy). It may be best to do nothing; and then we can backport the docs and uploading t

Re: [Geotools-devel] docs build setup

2011-03-24 Thread Jody Garnett
It is supposed to indicate the last stable release; so the website docs should match the latest thing you can download. Jody On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Jody, Justin, > > I'm just looking at the very beautiful sphinx setup on trunk, trying > to understand how all