I thought of another way to do it that confines the fix to
CSVFeatureWriter and does not involve any changes to
FilteringFeatureWriter. Much cleaner, IMO.
Still need to do remove and add...
Lee
On 5/12/2011 8:59 AM, lee-verizon wrote:
> ok, I came up with something that seems to work - in
> F
Cool; if you can indicate which tasks need volunteers it will help sort things
out. Perhaps when you remove the KVP example.
It also occurs to me that CQL / ECQL added some support for matchCase; I did
not pay attention to the details but hopefully they can follow a similar
solution to work wit
+1.
On 12/05/11 12:25, Niels wrote:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Support+Multi-Valued+Attributes+in+Filter+Comparison+Operators
>
> Open for review now.
>
> --
> Niels Charlier
>
> Software Engineer
> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
> Phone: +61 8 6436 8914
>
> Australi
The idea of the Map was in case other properties are added in the
future, that the filterfactory interface doesn't have to change anymore.
But by popular demand, I will change it.
The proposal is updated now with all your remarks..
On 12/05/11 22:06, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
I don't have reall
Hi Jody,
Yes I would love it if others were able step in and help with this. The
only thing I currently need for the short term is step (1). Currently in
app-schema everyone is used to the 'any' behaviour as that is what has
previously been supported, and that is in the short run the only thin
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for your reply. To respond to your questions/remarks.
1. Yes, XML parsers will need to be updated too, that will be one of the
last steps. We were currently only thinking of providing the back-end
support. I will add it to the to-do list though.
2. Only methods should be ad
Nice one Justin - thanks very much.
Michael
On 13 May 2011 00:42, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> The GeoTools community is happy to announce the release of 2.7.1:
> http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2011/05/geotools-271-released.html
> Thanks for using GeoTools!
> --
> The GeoTools Team
> -
I usually just run the tests that failed in maven; However you can tight click
on the 'test' folder in eclipse and run JUnit tests (it will run all the tests
in the folder)
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 13 May 2011 at 10:15 AM, lee-verizon wrote:
> Yeah, I figured out the 'mvn install'. But for
Yeah, I figured out the 'mvn install'. But for running tests in eclipse,
I don't see how to 'run all tests' within eclipse.
Lee
On 5/12/2011 3:42 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
It it uses the jars in ~/.m2/repository
To "install' your jars (for gt-data or gt-main) go into those
directories and say
Niels I know you don't have a mandate to do all that work; do you want to break
the tasks section up to show what is needed short term for your deliverable; in
addition to these wider changes to api / parser / docs.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 13 May 2011 at 12:06 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
It it uses the jars in ~/.m2/repository
To "install' your jars (for gt-data or gt-main) go into those directories and
say "mvn install".
Also if you have loaded everything into eclipse then when you run the tests
from eclipse it will use your local edits.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 13 May 20
ok, I came up with something that seems to work - in
FilteringFeatureWriter>hasNext(), it is doing this:
SimpleFeature peek;
while (writer.hasNext()) {
peek = writer.next();
if (filter.evaluate(peek)) {
next = peek;
ret
I'm +1 on this after hearing this too.
Ian
On 12 May 2011 04:55, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:55 AM, wrote:
>>>I was under the impression that your project is nearing end and at the
>>>project end you would be pulled off to other tasks... maybe I'm wrong.
>>
>> You aren't wr
Another maven/build question: When I go to project gt-jdbc-h2 at a
command prompt and run, say, mvn test, does that use any local edits
I've made to, say, gt-data or gt-main? Or does it strictly use the
latest jar files for all its dependencies? How do I run a build/test so
that it *does* use m
The GeoTools community is happy to announce the release of 2.7.1:
http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2011/05/geotools-271-released.html
Thanks for using GeoTools!
--
The GeoTools Team
--
Achieve unprecedented app perfor
I don't have really anything to add past Andreas feedback. The proposal
looks good but I echo Andreas statements to only apply the collection
wrappers in cases where one of the sides of the filter is already a
collection. As for the new method on filter factory I agree just be explicit
and add a ne
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Niels wrote:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Support+Multi-Valued+Attributes+in+Filter+Comparison+Operators
I don't have the Filter 2.0 specification handy but afaik you'll also
have to update the
OGC interfaces for those filters to add the matchAction
On 12/05/11 16:49, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Niels wrote:
I noticed that whenever there is a concat in an expression of your filter in
a query, that filter is applied as a post-filter because geotools can't
translate it to a where clause.
But why don't SQL dialects lik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:55 AM, wrote:
>>I was under the impression that your project is nearing end and at the
>>project end you would be pulled off to other tasks... maybe I'm wrong.
>
> You aren't wrong, the major projects are all ending so you won't see quite as
> much activity as before t
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Niels wrote:
> I noticed that whenever there is a concat in an expression of your filter in
> a query, that filter is applied as a post-filter because geotools can't
> translate it to a where clause.
> But why don't SQL dialects like oracle support concat? Surely i
feature property accessor generates multiple times the same value for simple
features & types
-
Key: GEOT-3583
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3583
21 matches
Mail list logo
