Re: [Geotools-devel] Parsing WCS XML with GeoTools - possible?

Yeah, probably an issue with the ows bindings. Unfortunately they are sort of battle tested as someone tries to support parsing or encoding of a specific schema. @Jon: Could you provide the document you are trying to parse, i will take a look to see what the issue is. That said, I just whipped up

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-8.x-nightly #138

See -- [...truncated 245 lines...] [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'snapshot org.geotools.maven:jar-collector:8-SNAPSHOT' [INFO] Retr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Parsing WCS XML with GeoTools - possible?

Too deep for me! You will have to ask Justin (or Andrea if you promise to fix window concurrent build issues for him). -- Jody Garnett On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 6:09 AM, Jon Britton wrote: > Thanks for the info Jody. > > I've been playing around with it a bit today and I've got s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Parsing WCS XML with GeoTools - possible?

Sorry, forgot to paste the root cause of that exception, but here's the whole thing: java.lang.RuntimeException: Parsing failed for AllowedValues: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to set property: Value for eobject: { http://www.opengis.net/ows/1.1}AllowedValues at org.geotools.xml.impl.ParseEx

Re: [Geotools-devel] Parsing WCS XML with GeoTools - possible?

Thanks for the info Jody. I've been playing around with it a bit today and I've got some bindings generated. I'm having trouble parsing a Capabilities response however and getting the following exception. java.lang.RuntimeException: Parsing failed for AllowedValues: java.lang.RuntimeException: Un

Re: [Geotools-devel] improving support for spatialite

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > Do you have any one in particular you like? Indeed having it be a jdbc > datastore is quite nice to inherit the tests. But if there is another lib > that makes it easier to integrate with spatialite it just might be worth > it. The pain

Re: [Geotools-devel] improving support for spatialite

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> The sqlitejdbc project. >> >> http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC >> >> A while back i submitted a patch but it was pretty rough, again lacking >> any support for

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding EMF model for WCS 2.0

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Right. I would like to hear Ben's take but in general I don't think many > of the other models actually use the xlink model for anything other than > the purpose of generating their own initial model. So i would say if > everything compil

Re: [Geotools-devel] improving support for spatialite

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > The sqlitejdbc project. > > http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC > > A while back i submitted a patch but it was pretty rough, again lacking > any support for 64 bit windows. > > http://code.google.com/p/xerial/issues/det

Re: [Geotools-devel] improving support for spatialite

The sqlitejdbc project. http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC A while back i submitted a patch but it was pretty rough, again lacking any support for 64 bit windows. http://code.google.com/p/xerial/issues/detail?id=86 Since then i have improved upon this but haven't updated the

Re: [Geotools-devel] improving support for spatialite

Hi Justin, one quick question, you are having problems to get your patches into the sqlite project or in the spatialite project? Thanks, Andrea On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:09 AM, andrea antonello > wrote: >> >> Sorry for coming back

Re: [Geotools-devel] NAVD88

That ~70 MB is a fair bit to store in source control. I have some experience hooking ant into maven, and asking the ant script to download data (if needed). So yes this would be an appropriate geotools extension (that is functionality or utility that is built on top of the geotools library) We j