Re: [Geotools-devel] Meeting minutes GeoTools/GeoServer meeting Jan 20 2015

Hi Ben, that's great news :-) Cheers Andrea On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Hi everybody, I am back! (Although still going though my mailing list > backlog.) > > A bit early, but I should be able to make the next committee meeting > (while NZ daylight saving lasts):

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4997) Allow AnchorPoint to be optional during PointPlacement transform

Title: Message Title Jody Garnett created an issue

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : GeoTools-11.x #115

See -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4996) GeoPackage should encode SRID with Geometry

Title: Message Title Jared Erickson created an issue

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-11.x #142

See -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub

Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to SOLR data store

Sounds like a consistent design. We have dialect for JDBCDataStore, strategy for for CSVDataStore etc... The Solr datastore is one of Andrea's "unsupported" modules - so you will need to check with Andrea about making changes. -- Jody Garnett On 26 January 2015 at 17:39, Justin Deoliveira wrote

[Geotools-devel] Updates to SOLR data store

Hi folks, I have been looking at the solr data store that was developed recently and I have a mandate to make some modifications to it. Before proceeding I wanted to bounce the approach off of the group first. First change I need is pretty simple, and it's to support the bounding box field type.

[Geotools-devel] module matrix

I have handed out a couple of developer manual links that reference the now abandoned module matrix wiki pages. Serves two purposes: * point of call for unsupported modules * level of maturity used when evaluating modules for graduation Is it worth cutting this out of our developers guide? -- Jo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Newbie

Welcome Tyler, I am keen to hear how GeoGig is getting along. -- Jody Garnett On 26 January 2015 at 17:18, Tyler Battle wrote: > Hi folks, > > My name is Tyler Battle and I'm a software developer at Boundless. I've > been at the Victoria office for a couple of months now and figured I should >

[Geotools-devel] Newbie

Hi folks, My name is Tyler Battle and I'm a software developer at Boundless. I've been at the Victoria office for a couple of months now and figured I should introduce myself. I've mostly been working on stuff related to the GeoGig project (http://geogig.org/) which uses GeoTools. I'll probably ha

Re: [Geotools-devel] Meeting minutes GeoTools/GeoServer meeting Jan 20 2015

Hi everybody, I am back! (Although still going though my mailing list backlog.) A bit early, but I should be able to make the next committee meeting (while NZ daylight saving lasts): http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2015&month=2&day=3&hour=17&min=30&sec=0&p1=256&p2=

Re: [Geotools-devel] committer nomination for Torben Barsballe

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > As per other thread (ContentFeatureSource event fix) I would like to > nomintate Torben for commit access to act as module maintainer for the > gt-property datastore. > > Torben has submitted a number of pull request (both for PropertyDataSto

[Geotools-devel] committer nomination for Torben Barsballe

As per other thread (ContentFeatureSource event fix) I would like to nomintate Torben for commit access to act as module maintainer for the gt-property datastore. Torben has submitted a number of pull request (both for PropertyDataStore) and critically for ContentDataStore. Throughout this time he

Re: [Geotools-devel] Improving the gt-csv module - Migrate to supported?

Yeah, I understand it is too late (or supposed to be) for the current series. It's not critical to me to have it in this release, but certainly for next time. If the rules are bent and it's allowed in though, I'm okay with that too. :) For the code coverage, it seems to be about 70-80%, which I be