Re: [Geotools-devel] CircularString and 3D

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Olle Markljung wrote: > It's not alot but it might happen and since everything then breaks the > impact is quite profound. > It's an Oracle NG datastore. When making offsets Oracle Spatial might > create arcs. > > Before no one noticed since images from GeoServer

Re: [Geotools-devel] CircularString and 3D

One more thought: We had some kind of FORCE 2D hint that WMS could use to ask for the data back as 2D (ignoring the 2.5 D for speed). Perhaps if you can figure out how to get oracle to respect that (with an SQL function) we can get the curves back from the database as 2D...). I can find some exam

Re: [Geotools-devel] CircularString and 3D

It's not alot but it might happen and since everything then breaks the impact is quite profound. It's an Oracle NG datastore. When making offsets Oracle Spatial might create arcs. Before no one noticed since images from GeoServer would be without these and GML-responses would have no geometry node

Re: [Geotools-devel] CircularString and 3D

Interesting, from my perspective this was a new feature and I did not expect any regressions. The exception makes a bit of sense, unable to interpolate the 3D positions. I am curious what store you are using for your data that has lots of circular strings. How did it work previously that the geome

[Geotools-devel] CircularString and 3D

Hello, I'm eager to find out why CircularString throws an exception instead of just logging a warning when confronted with geometries in 3D (or more). https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/api/src/main/java/org/geotools/geometry/jts/CircularString.java#L90 In 10.2 we di

Re: [Geotools-devel] Next committee meeting on 1 or 8 September?

Great! The 8th it is. Kind regards, Ben. On 28/08/15 07:43, Andrea Aime wrote: > Yes, it was actually my duty to propose that on the ml, but I forgot :) > > Thanks Ben for reminding us. > > 8 September works better for me > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jody Garnett >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Next committee meeting on 1 or 8 September?

Yes, it was actually my duty to propose that on the ml, but I forgot :) Thanks Ben for reminding us. 8 September works better for me Cheers Andrea On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > September 8th would be great, it would also allows us to creatively miss > foss4g (when se

Re: [Geotools-devel] Next committee meeting on 1 or 8 September?

September 8th would be great, it would also allows us to creatively miss foss4g (when several of us will be away). -- Jody Garnett On 27 August 2015 at 12:34, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Would youse like to have the next committee meeting on 1 September (as > originally scheduled) or 8 Septembe

[Geotools-devel] Next committee meeting on 1 or 8 September?

Would youse like to have the next committee meeting on 1 September (as originally scheduled) or 8 September (two weeks after the last meeting on 25 August)? Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

[Geotools-devel] JSR-275 discussion

James Hughes and myself have had a last moment review of the JScience JSR-275 beta dependency used in GeoTools (due to an IP complaint). Long story short the, the actual JSR-275 has been withdrawn (and did not have an open source license). Its replacement is taking shape (and looks great) but does

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5204) Support system property to enable JAIExt operations

Title: Message Title Daniele Romagnoli created an issue

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5203) Concurrency issue in PointPairDistance

Title: Message Title Christoph Pirkl created an issue