Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the status of the release. Are we all ready to go? I think that
> Richard usually volunteers up his time to do the release? I know that he
> is kind of busy this week so I can volunteer on this one.
>
In this weeks meeting we discussed the show st
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 16:19 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
> We still have some showstoppers on the geotools 2.2 release ...
>
> - need javadocs figured out, but martin is away so perhaps someone
> else will have to post (unless rgould knows the magic)
This should be fixed in svn. However, the perso
I'm looking at being done this week.
Jesse
On 26-Jul-06, at 2:57 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
> timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
>
> I would prefer to have this in the next minor version, 2.2.1.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
> timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
>
We still have some showstoppers on the geotools 2.2 release ... I tried
to mention them earlier but I did not see it make the list -
Hi Jesse,
Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
I would prefer to have this in the next minor version, 2.2.1. We could
also release GeoServer 1.4.1 at the same time containing the wfs
patches. Does anyone else have a
As a matter of fact I should be far enough along so that the release
can be made friday and any other bug fixes will be relatively minor
and can go in a later release.
Jesse
On 26-Jul-06, at 2:57 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a fe
Ok, well I think what I will do for now is just deploy the 2.2.0 jars so
that I can do what I need to do in geoserver. I wont do any of the other
release stuff though. That can wait until next week.
-Justin
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> I'm looking at being done this week.
>
> Jesse
>
> On 26-Jul-06,
You mind holding up for a bit Justin? I have a few fixes for WFS
that I'd like to sneak in and some of them concern geoserver. As you
know I have been working hard on getting the WFS client to work well
with Geoserver in particular but there are a couple of show stopping
bugs that have cr
Hi all,
What is the status of the release. Are we all ready to go? I think that
Richard usually volunteers up his time to do the release? I know that he
is kind of busy this week so I can volunteer on this one.
How does that sound Richard? Is there anything I need to know or can I
go straight
I think it would have some positives, particularily for users who do not intend to use a plugin which uses it. That said, it's a fair bit of work and testing without any noticable benefits beyond developers testing the core.
I wouldn't move the abstract classes / interfaces out, and the remaind
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
Great, so now that Martin is all in I think that leaves room for Jesse
to do the indexed shapefile merge.
If Jesse do some work on the shapefile modules, I would appreciate a
favor. Many tests open a file (as InputStream or ReadableByteChannel),
but almost none of
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Great, so now that Martin is all in I think that leaves room for Jesse
to do the indexed shapefile merge.
Nice to see things coming together :-)
David did you want to have a module/xml set up? The idea was brought up
on Mondays meeting.
Jody
---
Great, so now that Martin is all in I think that leaves room for Jesse
to do the indexed shapefile merge.
-Justin
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
I finished moving the test-data directories. The room should be clear
since revision 17482 for merging shapefile and indexed shapefile. I
updated the te
I finished moving the test-data directories. The room should be clear
since revision 17482 for merging shapefile and indexed shapefile. I
updated the text explaining how to fetch resources using TestData:
http://www.geotools.org/display/GEOT/5.8+Test+Data
Martin.
Ian Turton wrote:
just to clarify, was the meeting at 20:00 utc? possibly more
importantly will it be then next week?
19:00 UTC
Page is: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Internet+Relay+Chat
Meeting time is capped, etc... I will be unable to attend next, but
will attend there after.
just to clarify, was the meeting at 20:00 utc? possibly more importantly will it be then next week?
Ian
-- Ian Turtonhttp://www.geotools.org
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
We discussed starting the ball rolling on the 2.2 release. So this is a
call for any pending changes to make it into the release.
Just commited a partial reorganisation of test-data
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-795) as of revision 17482.
Updated wiki page
Hi all,
I apologize to anyone who showed up at todays IRC meeting and found
noone around. There was some confusion about meeting times and one of
the geoserver meetings.
However there were a few stragglers still around so we managed to
meeting. Logs have been posted.
We discussed starting
18 matches
Mail list logo
