Jody Garnett wrote:
> Since it involves an API change I would rather to this right now if you
> are available Gabriel.
>
Gabriel was not available; but David Windslow was. We closed out the
GeoAPI bug on this subject; and updated FeatureStore.addFeatures( ... )
to return a List.
- http://jira
Hi all,
I think understand the creation of the 2.5.x branch for geotools has
been waiting on the go-ahead from GeoServer. We're definitely ready to
create this branch now. We'd like to follow the following plan to
create a release ASAP:
* branch 2.5.x immediately
* build geoserver against it
Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> Hi Jody,
>
> my understanding from yesterday's meeting was that we needed to branch 2.5.x
> in order to not hold back other projects, but no release were needed so 2.5.x
> becoming a development branch means we can tackle those pending issues after
> the branch is created
Hi Jody,
my understanding from yesterday's meeting was that we needed to branch 2.5.x
in order to not hold back other projects, but no release were needed so 2.5.x
becoming a development branch means we can tackle those pending issues after
the branch is created. Is this possible at all?
more
Jody Garnett wrote:
> - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1896 User Guide must include all
> licenses
>
I am gong to volunteer for this one; will respond when closed.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your
Thanks David:
One question before we start:
- Gabriel? Andrea and myself were talking about keeping FeatureIds
stable during a geoserver transaction; the quick solution involves
feature events (you are aware of the work) the nice solution involves an
API change. Can you review the email message
Hi all,
I think understand the creation of the 2.5.x branch for geotools has
been waiting on the go-ahead from GeoServer. We're definitely ready to
create this branch now. We'd like to follow the following plan to
create a release ASAP:
* branch 2.5.x immediately
* build geoserver against it, r
