Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-17 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi again, the 2 proposals are ready: *Views manager cleanup:* *Proposal:* http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Views+Management+removal *Associated JIRA:* https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-5050 *Related pull request* https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/782 *JAI-EXT integration:*

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Daniele, just a quick clarification, we would be deprecating views on 13.x, and just drop them on 14.x, and there would be no jai-ext work on 13.x So, it would be two very different pull requests, the 13.x being just adding @Deprecated annotations around for anything we'd be dropping in 14.x Cheer

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Team, Nicola is working on setting up 2 proposals: One for the viewsType deprecation and the other for the JAI-EXT integration. He will come back as soon as possible (tomorrow or the next day) with links to the Confluence pages containing them. We haven't done that before since we had originally

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-16 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Jody, I have put this in Daniele and Nicola's hands as I don't have time for this atm. They will follow up shortly. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-15 Thread Jody Garnett
So what specifically do you want to deprecate. Reply to the email or send a pull request, need to deprecate now to be in position to remove later. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:21 AM Simone Giannecchini < [email protected]> wrote: > Ciao Jody, > that would be _great_. > > Regards, >

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-14 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Jody, that would be _great_. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phon

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay, As an emergency release next week measure can we at least deprecate the ViewType interfaces for the GeoTools 13.0 release. That would allow us to drop the class for GeoTools 14.0 Jody -- Jody Garnett On 13 March 2015 at 12:04, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > so we have a separate thread that

[Geotools-devel] A bit of a mess in coverage related proposals

2015-03-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, so we have a separate thread that contains actually two proposed changes: * One by Daniele to drop the ViewType * One by Nicola to switch to jai-ext Both are in the wrong place... they should be proposals in Confluence, so that we can vote on them, and they should be discussed in two separate