Re: [Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-21 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Updated the proposal > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ReferencingFactoryFinder+incompatible+change > > I tried to make my intend a little bit more explicit: the user hints specified > in method signatures are merged with the hints specified at constr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-20 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : > The hint that we want to change > that way without touching the others is > Hints.FORCE_LONGITUDE_FIRST_AXIS_ORDER. Actually we want to remove it for URN. And the control on whatever global hints are merged or not (the STRICT/DEFAULT stuff) is there for preventing

Re: [Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-20 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Updated the proposal http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ReferencingFactoryFinder+incompatible+change I tried to make my intend a little bit more explicit: the user hints specified in method signatures are merged with the hints specified at construction time, and optionnaly with global hint

Re: [Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Your approach preserve compatibility, but on the other hand > ReferencingFactoryFinder > was added in 2.4, so we are allowed to change it (while I admit that it is > late > in the release process). > Fair enough; Andrea and Justin are the only people likely to free

Re: [Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-17 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jody Jody Garnett a écrit : > Hi Martin I finally figured out why this conversation was going sideways > on me; you can perform this transition in a compatible way... note you > should probably comment out these static methods while you make the > transition; and we can add them back into t

[Geotools-devel] Compatible change proposal

2008-01-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin I finally figured out why this conversation was going sideways on me; you can perform this transition in a compatible way... note you should probably comment out these static methods while you make the transition; and we can add them back into the mix (deprecated if you want) for the