On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>> Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to
>> update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all
>> the xlink fixes? Especially the gm
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to
> update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all
> the xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored
> out all the is
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to update
all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all the
xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored out
all the iso schema (gcd, gmx, etc...)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben
On 04/12/12 23:41, Andrea Aime wrote:
> However, all the schemas in the main gml 3.2 are also different in some way,
> thought I've not verified to what extent)
When Justin created the original GML 3.2.1 bindings, he modified or
removed several types in xsd files to break cyclic type definitions
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold
> turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old
> schemas?).
>
> I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink schema to
> all th
Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold
turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old schemas?).
I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink schema to all
the old standards… does that have a chance of working for us?
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was trying to setup the code so that it can validate WCS 2.0 documents,
> but
> right now it seems mission impossible due to OGC's handywork with Xlink
> and deep GML 3.2.1 changes...
>
> Basically, the validation of a WCS 2.0 caps docu
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Indeed, GML 3.2.1 seems a lot simpler than the GML 3.2 we have in the
> classpath.
> Compare this:
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/master/modules/extension/xsd/xsd-gml3/src/main/resources/org/geotools/gml3/v3_2
> with this:
> http
Hi,
I was trying to setup the code so that it can validate WCS 2.0 documents,
but
right now it seems mission impossible due to OGC's handywork with Xlink
and deep GML 3.2.1 changes...
Basically, the validation of a WCS 2.0 caps document fails because WCS
refers GML 3.2.1 via the gmlcov schemas, an
