the build process? if you confirm I will take care of it.
Gabriel.
>
> Suggestions Chris, and we need to update the osgeo wiki page as this is
> a good trade off to document.
> Jody
>
> > ---- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [Geotools-devel] IP issu
r distribution without an express license from them.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:08 AM
To: Rich Steele
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE]
The interfaces would be.
But we could have som
Looks like we should probably make a dummy jar for esri stuff...
Original Message
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE]
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:01:24 -0800
From: Rich Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Chris Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Okay cool - thanks Gabriel.
So we got two answers:
- ESRI - a jar downloaded without a licensing restriction - we should
try and find someone to talk to I guess?
- Oracle - a problem, we need to either ask nice or pay $2k to be a partner
Marc I understand that you would like to use the sdoapi.
On Saturday 25 March 2006 16:02, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Marc - module maintainer for Oracle
> Gabriel - module maintainer for ArcSDE
>
> We have an interesting twist with the jars required for your modules to
> build. The jars are not part of an open source project, and produced by
> a commercial
Hi Marc - module maintainer for Oracle
Gabriel - module maintainer for ArcSDE
We have an interesting twist with the jars required for your modules to
build. The jars are not part of an open source project, and produced by
a commercial company.
Gabriel I am not familiar with how we acquired th
