Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody, Thanks for catching the Envelope usage - much better. Yep - I was unsure about class names. On the one hand they are inconveniently long. On the other that means they get grouped together in the javadocs when you're using the 'All classes' listing (as I generally do). I don't feel str

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Michael; the Hudson build is still down until it does a fresh checkout (since it cannot checkout over top of its old demo/mappane-uses folder). I hope someone does not need to go into that server and fix it? Is there an svn update flag that will remove folders? I did a couple quick reviews a

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Michael Bedward
ok - I resurrected the mappane-use demo. Ian's MapViewer class just needed a few import / class name changes and it now builds ok. The intro demo builds now too. Meanwhile labelling of features (e.g. with countries.shp in the mappane-use/data dir) will not work properly right now. I've strippe

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Michael Bedward
sorry about that - I'll fix up the introduction now Michael -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Str

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Aside be careful to build; after you remove the jmappane sample use demo; the demo/introduction failed because it made use of that module. Hopefully we can revise demo/introduction to use your new api tomorrow? Jody Michael Bedward wrote: > cheers mate > > I'll put a simple demo up as well tomo

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Michael Bedward
cheers mate I'll put a simple demo up as well tomorrow to illustrate the story so far Michael 2009/3/2 Jody Garnett : > Thanks muchly - I am going to review tomorrow morning (during my weekly > office hours) and hopefully produce some nice docs. When at work I will > deploy a 2.6-SNAPSHOT and we

[Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-03-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks muchly - I am going to review tomorrow morning (during my weekly office hours) and hopefully produce some nice docs. When at work I will deploy a 2.6-SNAPSHOT and we can ask interested parties on the user list to try out the code / docs. fun fun fun Jody Michael Bedward wrote: > oops -

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Bedward
thanks Simone and Jody - sounds like a plan Michael -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-23 Thread Jody Garnett
I think Micheal and I will look at Johann's work after; there are lots of excellent ideas there. I think I would like to draw out that work (and others) across the library so there are swing widgets in the modules that they work on; both as an example; and to help us make writing examples easier. J

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-23 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Sounds like a good idea to me, even because as far as I have seen the difference between JMapPane and johann work is quite huge, at least in term of code dimension. Anyway, I am not sure how the swing widget work will turn out in the long run since, as far as I Know, the current work from johann

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-22 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody - sorry to hear you've been unwell - there are a few bugs floating around Sydney at the moment. Johann told me some more about his current work and the status of swing-widgets-pending last week... http://n2.nabble.com/spike-td2345012.html#a2346288 I've mulled a bit (code for looked blankl

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-22 Thread Jody Garnett
I want to review the setState method in the 2nd cut :-) And introduce the concept of a Tool (ie a delegate that handles mouse events and defines the cursor). But yeah general clean up would be great; and we should javadoc what the methods do (even if we decide later they do not make sense as named

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Bedward
2009/2/17 Ian Turton : > go for it :-) > Super :-) Jody, let me know about any specifics you'd like to see in the first cut. Otherwise, I'll start off with a general clean-up and refactoring of the existing JMapPane. I'll warn the user list before committing. cheers Michael --

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-16 Thread Ian Turton
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Ian: > > I have been talking with Michael Bedward about improving JMapPane a bit; > you are the module maintainer on this one (last commit in 2007). Do you > mind if we hack away for a bit? My hope is that Michael will do the work > and I w

[Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-15 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Ian: I have been talking with Michael Bedward about improving JMapPane a bit; you are the module maintainer on this one (last commit in 2007). Do you mind if we hack away for a bit? My hope is that Michael will do the work and I will document the result in the user guide (and update a couple of