Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> >>> Jody Garnett ha scritto: Interesting. Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the bounds of the current feature? >>> How has that anything to d

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Interesting. >>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>> the bounds of the current feature? >> How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread?

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Interesting. >>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>> the bounds of the current feature? >> How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread?

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Jody Garnett
On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Interesting. >> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the >> bounds of the current feature? > How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-) You asked about a "dynamic"

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Interesting. > > Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the > bounds of the current feature? How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-) The environment function has no feature scoping, the values are set using setL

Re: [Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Jody Garnett
Interesting. Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the bounds of the current feature? Jody On 25/05/2010, at 7:57 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking for a way to make EnvFunction used in filters > play nice with databases and stores in general. > > W

[Geotools-devel] Making SLD param substitution go down to the databases

2010-05-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I'm looking for a way to make EnvFunction used in filters play nice with databases and stores in general. What happens now is that the function is not recognized and thus forces that part of the filter to be evaluated in memory. It would be nice to perform the param value expansion into a lit