Martin is there any chance we can take the good part of JScience3 and
just skip out on their implementation of ordinates?
We will upgrate the javax.units package to an implementation which will probably be close to
identical (from an API point of view) to JScience. But I would like that JSR-27
Clint Lewis wrote:
Hi Martin,
that is great the javax.units part is what i need. I am work on
Susceptance and would like to define it in a way that is compatible
with JScience, much the same way you did SEXAGESIMAL_DMS in geotools
Units.
If we not using JScience3 then what Java Docs should
Clint Lewis a écrit :
If we not using JScience3 then what Java Docs should I be using to find
out what is there for my example.
http://jsr-108.sourceforge.net/javadoc/index.html
But it is going to be replaced by JSR-275 (probably similar to JScience) if we
can get to finish it...
Hi Martin,
that is great the javax.units part is what i need. I am work on
Susceptance and would like to define it in a way that is compatible with
JScience, much the same way you did SEXAGESIMAL_DMS in geotools Units.
If we not using JScience3 then what Java Docs should I be using to find
o
Clint Lewis a écrit :
Just looked at the JScience3 http://jscience.org/ site now, do you know
if we will be upgrading this project to use some of the JScience3 stuff.
This is not planned in the near future, except the javax.units part (which should be made available
in a separated download).
