Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>
>> Doing the 2.5.0 release i ran into a minor issue with the newly added
>> imagemosaic-jdbc module. It depends on gt-coverageio which is
>> unsupported. So to include it in the release we would have to include
>> coverageio... which
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> * remove references to coverageio in the javadocs ... (not sure how hard
> this one will be)
Adding "org.geotools.coverage.io:*org.geotools.image.io*" in the (or
something similar) section of the javadoc configuration in pom.xml should be
suffisient. I'm not sure
Good news! With the help of Simone it appears that the coverageio
dependency is actually not needed. So simply removing it does the trick
nicely.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for clarifying. So I think long term we should upgrade the parts
> coverageio that are used to supp
Hi Martin,
Thanks for clarifying. So I think long term we should upgrade the parts
coverageio that are used to supported... given that they are relatively
static.
However I think for the short term relaxing our policy about including
"private" modules in the build is a compromise for a few re
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> Doing the 2.5.0 release i ran into a minor issue with the newly added
> imagemosaic-jdbc module. It depends on gt-coverageio which is
> unsupported. So to include it in the release we would have to include
> coverageio... which goes against our plan of excluding uns
Hi all,
Doing the 2.5.0 release i ran into a minor issue with the newly added
imagemosaic-jdbc module. It depends on gt-coverageio which is
unsupported. So to include it in the release we would have to include
coverageio... which goes against our plan of excluding unsupported modules.
So... tw
