Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-06 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > I get the impression with jaxb though all you do is throw some > annotations on some objects and your parsing/serializing is done. Yes, it work like that. Additional work are required if we want to works with GeoAPI interfaces, not only the annotated implementations

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-05 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I think it might be worth looking at. But doing bindings is still quite a bit of work. If your model is an emf model it can be a lot less work. I get the impression with jaxb though all you do is throw some annotations on some objects and your parsing/serializing is done. I could be wrong. Last

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Is it worth looking at; or should Martin stick with jaxb? Does not look like we can seperate out a metadata plugin at this time ( a factory needs to be set up). Jody > I would not really call it a "standard". The one that does ship with > the core of the library is unmaintained, and the second

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-04 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I would not really call it a "standard". The one that does ship with the core of the library is unmaintained, and the second generation of it is an extension. Jody Garnett wrote: > Martin just a thought; have you considered using the xml binding > framework - is the geotools standard after all.

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Sorry that message was ment for the uDig list; which is learning to work with Gabriel this week :-) Jody > It seems that building geotools locally acquires the dependency; it is > okay to download from one of the mirrors... something like the following. > >> > dest="${lib}/xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar"

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-04 Thread Jody Garnett
It seems that building geotools locally acquires the dependency; it is okay to download from one of the mirrors... something like the following. > dest="${lib}/xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar" usetimestamp="true" > ignoreerrors="true" verbose="true" /> > dest="${lib}/xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar" usetimestamp="true"

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Seriously try it out using the example and documentation; it should meet your needs (and then some). And it would really benifit the rest of our community - they could then delegate to your xml bindings when parsing get capabilities documents and so forth. Remember sun may fold stuff into Java

[Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin just a thought; have you considered using the xml binding framework - is the geotools standard after all. It may not be sun but it is dependency every downloads. Jody - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft De