Thanks Gabe, do we have to update any docs? Maybe the maven pom.xml to
reflect the new best practice...
- -
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Just a heads up that this is happening.
Thanks to everyone that tested and commented on the pull request.
*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
*Gabriel Roldán*
Geospatial Solutions Architect
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:23 AM Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wro
+1
Regards,
Andrea Aime
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
https://www.geos
Thanks Jody and Ian for voting.
Andrea, Nuno, Simone, Torben, if you could vote or raise any concern that'd
be great.
It's been 9 calendar days since the proposal, and if possible, I'd like to
avoid having to wait
for the 15 days established in the project policy for it to be
automatically accepte
+1
Ian Turton
On Tue, 20 May 2025, 19:45 Gabriel Roldan,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
> GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directl
+1 thanks Gabe!
- -
Jody Garnett
On May 20, 2025 at 10:48:04 AM, Gabriel Roldan <
gabriel.rol...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
> GeoTools code
Hi all,
I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly
related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals.
Details are on
