Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] osgeo budget request

2023-01-19 Thread Jody Garnett
Good point, I added a note to https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/142 and presented the idea of treating this topic as an "all or nothing" cross-project initiative. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:00 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Thanks for putting this together Jody. Only feedbac

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] osgeo budget request

2023-01-19 Thread Andrea Aime
Thanks for putting this together Jody. Only feedback I have, is that while the funding might be split for accounting/allocation purposes, the implementation is an "all or nothing". Otherwise +1 Cheers Andrea On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:35 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > Here is the GeoTools budget requ

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] osgeo budget request

2023-01-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Here is the GeoTools budget request for review: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/GeoTools-Budget-Request-2023 I was going to give the board the option of funding the opengis refactor project by project; or as a cross-project initiative (whatever they think is easier). -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] osgeo budget request

2023-01-07 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > I have provided a technical debt wiki page on refactoring org.opengis > packages (reversing the work we did to provide the interfaces to start the > project) in order to get an idea on the work required and costs involved: > https://github.com/

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] osgeo budget request

2023-01-05 Thread Ian Turton
+0 on the org.opengis - I might have capacity to do that work later this year but I can think of better things to do with the money. +1 on the security issues fund (might be able to tap the EU for funds for that) Ian On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 20:06, Jody Garnett wrote: > Good morning folks, > > OS