Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Still I am more worried about doing this for every set of interfaces;
> interfaces are a commitment - and as project leaders in GeoAPI we take a
> lot of time to manually check the interfaces against the standards. I
> would like to see us try to check it against Java co
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I did that for referencing, but unfortunatly can't do that for every
> modules.
Still I am more worried about doing this for every set of interfaces;
interfaces are a commitment - and as project leaders in GeoAPI we take a
lot of time to manually check the interfaces
Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> A while ago, GeoAPI had a "pending" directory for this kind of work.
>> This directory has been replaced by "trunk" for better alignment with
>> common practice. If there is an other layout proposal, I'm open to
>> that. The layout may be to put experimental interface
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Jody, in the above quoting you omitted the Andrea's words I was replying
> to...
> Up to this point, all my emails were only technical. You can verify in the
> archives.
>
No I did Martin; and thanks for taking the discussion technical again.
Changing the subject
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
>> What do you think that me (and other peoples) are thinking of your
>> altitude?
Jody, in the above quoting you omitted the Andrea's words I was replying to...
Up to this point, all my emails were only technical. You can verify in the
archiv
