Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Still I am more worried about doing this for every set of interfaces;
> interfaces are a commitment - and as project leaders in GeoAPI we take a
> lot of time to manually check the interfaces against the standards. I
> would like to see us try to check it against Java code as well.
>
> Perhaps we can have an annotation called @pending that marks any
> interface what has not been implemented yet?
A @pending annotation is a great idea. I'm taking note of that.
>> We can do runnable test cases. A lot of GeoTools referencing test
>> cases could be moved as GeoAPI tests. The tests can search for a
>> factory in META-INF/services and run. Like usual the only reason why
>> it is not yet done is lack of time.
> Still I like the idea; test cases are like javadocs you can run. Perhaps
> if we thought instead of them as code examples (rather then conformance
> tests) it would make them easier to write.
It is a little bit late for toonigh, but I will try to open a JIRA task for
that
tomorrow.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
