Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Makes sense; I will need to back that example off to use DataStoreFinder I guess. On 05/08/2010, at 11:23 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Thanks for the tip; the patch also contained some modifcations to demo >> Csv2Shp > > Yes, they are necessary to implement what you ask

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Thanks for the tip; the patch also contained some modifcations to demo Csv2Shp Yes, they are necessary to implement what you asked in the previous mails: have the shapefile factory handle directories directly as well (you asked for it). That means the shapefile factory

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks for the tip; the patch also contained some modifcations to demo Csv2Shp Jody On 05/08/2010, at 6:41 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Sounds fine andrea; if possible I would like to use the data module >> (for something!) or kill it. I figure it is the same purpose as th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Sounds fine andrea; if possible I would like to use the data module > (for something!) or kill it. I figure it is the same purpose as the > jdbc module (helper classes, root implementations and so forth). > > At least for the first cut do what we did with AbstractDatasto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-04 Thread Jody Garnett
Sounds fine andrea; if possible I would like to use the data module (for something!) or kill it. I figure it is the same purpose as the jdbc module (helper classes, root implementations and so forth). At least for the first cut do what we did with AbstractDatastore and rely on the test cases in sh

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > First up this is a good idea; and smarter then a general purpose > directory datastore (since we never got a vector and raster api the > idea of configuring all the stuff in one directory is doomed to fail). > > Some notes: > - Can we merge the abstract directory datasto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixing directory data store and moving it up

2010-08-03 Thread Jody Garnett
First up this is a good idea; and smarter then a general purpose directory datastore (since we never got a vector and raster api the idea of configuring all the stuff in one directory is doomed to fail). Some notes: - Can we merge the abstract directory datastore classes move it into the data modu