Hi Daniele,
I integrated your branch in my setup, and disabled my own workaround. I now
indeed get the expected behavior. I also reviewed the changes in your branch,
which also look fine.
Seems like another step in the right direction for better multidimensional
raster support!
thanks,
Jeroen
Hi Jeroen,
I have prepared a pull request containing your updates as well as my fix.
While waiting for the merge, do you have any chance to test if the updated
code solves your issue? (The test you added, is currently passing)
https://github.com/geosolutions-it/geoserver/tree/GEOS-6564
Cheers,
Da
Ok. I have found the reason.
The NetCDF output format support has been developed with a set of current
working assumptions (which may be relaxed with some additional development):
Quoting only one of them, from
http://docs.geoserver.org/2.4.1/user/community/netcdf-out/index.html
- Input coverag
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Daniele Romagnoli
Senior Software Engineer
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
http://www.geo-solu
Hi Daniele,
the test does show the issue: have a look at the bounding boxes of the
returned coverages: they do not correspond to the boxes of the original
granules, instead both have a bounding box equal to the one which is
requested. All of the other dimensions are also the same, so in fact th
Hi Jeroen,
I have checked your pull request and your tests but I didn't understand
where the problem is.
You are configuring a mosaic made of 2 granules
10,70 30,70 35,70 55,70
| | | |
| | | |
|
Thanks Jeroen,
I have seen that JIRA.
I'll take a look on this as soon as I can.
Thanks again for having set it up
Cheers,
Daniele.
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Daniele Romagnoli
Senior Software Engineer
GeoSolutio
Hi Daniele,
I created a JIRA issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6564[1]
I also created a unit test, which mimicks my setup, and exposes the issue:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/639[2]
It took my a bit of time, but I hope I can reuse this unit test setup in the
future to
My apologies,
I keep mixing up the geotools/geoserver lists...
On Wednesday 02 July 2014 16:38:58 Jeroen Dries wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing some strange behaviour in WCSDimensionsSubsetHelper in
> combination with a multi-dimensional mosaic:
>
> ->In the splitRequest method, all of the granu
Hi Jeroen,
If you also have a small sample mosaic (configuration and data) and a
request to replicate it, to be attached to JIRA, they would be very helpful
for debugging and fixing it.
Cheers,
Daniele
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more inf
10 matches
Mail list logo
