Just to wrap up this thread, as geotools project officer I am going to send
an email to the treasurer authorizing payment as soon as we have a signed
contract with the selected party.
Because we are approaching year end this would in effect being paying
upfront.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 5 Nov 201
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:26 AM Ian Turton wrote:
> Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to
> replace the mismash of xml technologies.
>
Hmm... a rewrite of XML techs with something would not be feasible if we
had 10 times more funding I think.
I think realisticall
Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to
replace the mismash of xml technologies.
+1
Ian
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 21:49, Jody Garnett wrote:
> It seems my email was taken as a motion, that is fine by me and I will add
> my +1
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct
It seems my email was taken as a motion, that is fine by me and I will add
my +1
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 14:49, Torben Barsballe
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Cheers,
> Torben
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions <
> nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
>
+1 from me.
Cheers,
Torben
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions <
nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using
>> mostly GeoTools code,
>> Ge
+1
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using
> mostly GeoTools code,
> GeoServer is providing mostly "glue" but the heavy lifting is done via the
> GeoTools libraries
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at
Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using
mostly GeoTools code,
GeoServer is providing mostly "glue" but the heavy lifting is done via the
GeoTools libraries
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:37 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
> GeoTools made a request for the default
+1 here
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:
Thanks Andrea, I have updated the draft budget accordingly.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:58 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> I don't think we're missing ideas, but it would pile up to too many
> sprints... asking companies to participate to
> more than one week long code sprint a year is too muc
Hi Jody,
I don't think we're missing ideas, but it would pile up to too many
sprints... asking companies to participate to
more than one week long code sprint a year is too much imho (unless the
companies involved live large or
have very little work to do anyways...)
Cheers
Andrea
On Fri, Jan 18,
Unless anything changes in this thread I will just indicate to the board we
are happy with the default 2,000 USD "operational" budget for the committee.
Seriously if anyone has an RnD or community building idea that we could
help nudge along with some funding please speak up as this is a good
oppo
Same here.
On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:12 +0100, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> same line here
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchini
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
> @simogeo
> Founder/Director
>
same line here
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:
I think I would need a lot of convincing to support this idea. Is there
really any evidence of LGPL putting people off?
Ian
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 08:46, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache projec
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett
wrote:
> - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache projects have in
> using LGPL) to relicense the library. I think the vast majority of the code
> base is covered under our code contribution agreement, and could just be
> relicensed. There
So the OSGeo board is proposing 2k as a starting point for each project ...
can I can confirm this is good for GeoTools?
As for GeoTools plans:
- The 2k above should be fine to respond to anything that comes up during
the year, I assume we will have a member attending the AGM already who can
speak
16 matches
Mail list logo
