GeoTools2 module build report 20060212
gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:main cleaned,
Like
I have understand the MIFDataStore intend for reading data from one layer (table)
saved
in mapinfo style file.
The
subject I want to discuss is *.mdf files, those files are used in Mapinfo java
framework to config
some
snapshot view (oops version control term) of the map, like
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Following Jody email
I looked at the coverage branch last week, but I had a hard time to
get usefull information from "svn diff" since it produces too much
output. I would like to try the following:
svn diff http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/gt/
http://svn.ge
Jody wrote on 02/11/2006 04:06:48 PM:
> I just sent an email to the geoapi list, for those that play there I
> would love to know what API the coverage branch is tracking...
Coverage branch currently uses OGC grid coverages. It contains
Simone's/Alessio's updates to various plugins and rendere
Martin wrote:
> Following Jody email
>
> But I currently get a change for every files, because of some changes
> like the addition of $URL$ keyword. Can we do one of the following (when
> Simone or Bryce would have a little bit of time of course)?
My current understanding was in a previous email
Sorry to those subscribed to both.
Subject:OSGeo-Discuss Formal Call For Nominations
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:09:08 -0500
From: Frank Warmerdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OSGeo Discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
In
Jody Garnett wrote:
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/stylish
STATUS: has been completed
ACTION: please REMOVE
CONTACT: cory
Removed.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? St
HI guys, please, see my thoughts, inlined below
On 2/13/06, Bryce L Nordgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martin wrote:
> > Following Jody email
> >
> > But I currently get a change for every files, because of some changes
> > like the addition of $URL$ keyword. Can we do one of the follow
Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
Jody wrote on 02/11/2006 04:06:48 PM:
I just sent an email to the geoapi list, for those that play there I
would love to know what API the coverage branch is tracking...
Coverage branch currently uses OGC grid coverages. It contains
Simone's/Alessio's updates to
On 2/12/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just sent an email to the geoapi list, for those that play there I
> would love to know what API the coverage branch is tracking...
>
> The rest of this email is me trying straighten things out geotools RnD
> by way of figuring out what justin
Jody has pointed out that I'm the only PMC not to vote on the matter,
and I realize it is a little late, but I'm mostly indifferent on the
topic. I am interested in it, but I don't understand the issues well
enough to make a positive or negative choice, so I am +0.
Cheers,
Richard
David Zwie
Ok, so that sounds like we have everyone +1 except Richard as +0? I've
provisionally told them to add us, since it seems like everyone is for
it. I just want to be sure we have an archived record of the vote, so
speak now or forever hold your peace: GeoTools is joining the Open
Source GeoSpat
Jody Garnett a écrit :
Are their any deadlines involved here? I know the feature model work for
geoserver work is on a timeline ...
There is no deadline on my side (especially since I'm a little bit busy
with GO-1 right now). But I believe that there is a deadline for Bryce...
I would like
Hello Simone
Thanks for yours update :). There is no rush on my side (as said
previously, I'm currently busy with GO-1 renderer implementation), so
you can take it cool as far as I'm concerned. My email was mostly
because I though that you and Bryce had deadline and I didn't wanted
that you g
Hi all,
For those eclipse ide users out there, maven allows you set up inter
module depenencies so that the eclipse target wil recognise them as
eclipse projects in your workspace, as opposed to a jar in the maven
repository.
I found this to be invaluable recently with the expression / api w
I think this would be great. I often have to fight with Eclipse
sometimes to get the source code to display properly. I would say go for
it, as long as there are no side-effects for non-Eclipse developers.
Cheers,
Richard
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
For those eclipse ide users out ther
Nope, non-eclipse developers dont have to worry, its just a special
property used by the maven:eclipse plugin.
-Justin
Richard Gould wrote:
I think this would be great. I often have to fight with Eclipse
sometimes to get the source code to display properly. I would say go for
it, as long as t
Hi all,
As follow up from the IRC meeting today I have merged the expresison /
filter api changes onto trunk. I am ready to commit but I thought I
would give people the heads up before I did since its a pretty large
merge. Any objections?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Projec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/13/2006 07:00:13 PM:
> Hi all,
>
> As follow up from the IRC meeting today I have merged the expresison /
> filter api changes onto trunk. I am ready to commit but I thought I
> would give people the heads up before I did since its a pretty large
> merge. Any object
Justin , Richard, ...
I looked at the maven plugin a while back and opted to not use it (file
locking issues) ... but sounds like I should give it another try.
FYI. I found having a couple projects open (one for each plugin /
module you intend to mofiy) works well too ... just another option.
FeatureIterator.hasNext() == false if
DefaultQuery.setCoordinateSystemReproject()
-
Key: GEOT-807
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-807
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Versions:
21 matches
Mail list logo
