Re: [Geotools-devel] SLD Parsing and WhiteSpaces

2008-07-29 Thread Andrea Aime
Emily Gouge ha scritto: > I'm following up from the irc chat earlier - to try determine what is the > "correct" behavior for the > SLDParser with regards to preserving whitespace in mixed content elements. > My understanding is that > mixed type elements are supposed to collapse all white-spac

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeographicMetadataFormat dubts

2008-07-29 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Martin Desruisseaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniele Romagnoli a écrit : > >> I have a question in such a context. >> I see the attribute "type" for the CRS node having an element of the >> CRS_TYPES list as a value. >> The CRS_TYPES list defined in Geographi

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1938) Force coordinate system reader/iterator are not forcing crs anymore

2008-07-29 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Force coordinate system reader/iterator are not forcing crs anymore --- Key: GEOT-1938 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1938 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug

[Geotools-devel] 2.5 branch cleanup proposal

2008-07-29 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Proposal for the 2.5 branch: Delete JAXB annotations on metadata --- They are not fully functional in the way they are implemented because of the Java 5/6 compilation trick. Furthermore, dummy-jaxb has been changed after our initial commit in order to workaround E

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resample for cropping small parts of a coverage

2008-07-29 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Martin, What do you mean by the fact that Affine operation was failing? I think this might bring an important use case in the picture, but as of now I can't remember any discussion on this issue ( I might be remembering wrong of course). Anyway, before discussing about the rounding issue itse

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resample for cropping small parts of a coverage

2008-07-29 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > What do you mean by the fact that Affine operation was failing? > I think this might bring an important use case in the picture, but as > of now I can't remember any discussion on this issue ( I might be > remembering wrong of course). Anyway, before discussing abou

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resample for cropping small parts of a coverage

2008-07-29 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Martin, a clarification, by Affine you mean the simple Affine or the Warp Affine (I would assume the second). Simone. On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Martin Desruisseaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > >> What do you mean by the fact that Affine operation wa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resample for cropping small parts of a coverage

2008-07-29 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > a clarification, by Affine you mean the simple Affine or the Warp Affine > (I would assume the second). I'm not sure it was about the exact type of JAI operation used. I don't think that JAI itself was failing. If I remember right, it was about the destination im

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5 branch cleanup proposal

2008-07-29 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Proposal for the 2.5 branch: > > Delete JAXB annotations on metadata > --- > They are not fully functional in the way they are implemented because of the > Java 5/6 compilation trick. Furthermore, dummy-jaxb has been changed after > our

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resample for cropping small parts of a coverage

2008-07-29 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Going by memory as far the Resample operation is concerned, I think I understand to what you are referring to. Many JAI operations like Affine, Scale, SubsampleAverage, FilteredSubsample, etc.., do NOT respect the ImageLayout minX, minY, width and height hints. Citing the Affine operations: "It ma

[Geotools-devel] Use of FunctionImpl for new functions

2008-07-29 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Guys: Emily found out that my new "Concatenate" function did not work - because the number of arguments was treated as an upper limit :-) If you extend FunctionImpl this check is not performed; I have changed Concatenate to use FunctionImpl as a superclass (rather than FunctionExpressionImp

Re: [Geotools-devel] Use of FunctionImpl for new functions

2008-07-29 Thread johann.sorel
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Hi Guys: > > Emily found out that my new "Concatenate" function did not work - > because the number of arguments was treated as an upper limit :-) If > you extend FunctionImpl this check is not performed; I have changed > Concatenate to use FunctionImpl as a superclass (

Re: [Geotools-devel] Use of FunctionImpl for new functions

2008-07-29 Thread Jody Garnett
johann.sorel wrote: > At this time I removed the check because the factory got crazy (she > tryes to create a function with no parameter) and it was not the upper > limit but the lower limit. I am not having a problem with the factory? Only with the function implementation - you have a stack tra

[Geotools-devel] RasterSymbolizer: OverlapBehavior vs Overlaps

2008-07-29 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Emily; I was unable to remove setOverlaps at this time. Let us wait while Johann defines a org.opengis.style.StyleFactory; until we have the ability to easily make new style objects we are going to need to continue using the various set methods. Jody

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #876

2008-07-29 Thread ak
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/876/changes Changes: [jgarnett] add a test case for concatenate [jgarnett] treat get argument count as a minimum [jgarnett] Treat getArgumentsCount as a minimum -- [...truncated 1141 lines.

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #877

2008-07-29 Thread ak
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/877/changes - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win gre