Re: [Geotools-devel] transformation from/to WGS84-CH1903

2008-12-11 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Martin Tomko a écrit : > DOes that mean that the epsg-hsql jar of GT2 contians an incorrect WKT > specification of the projection? That should probably be fixed there too... No, epsg-hsql is correct. The WKT that I posted yesterday was produced by epsg-hsql... Martin

Re: [Geotools-devel] transformation from/to WGS84-CH1903

2008-12-11 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Martin Tomko a écrit : > very strange, I used the snapshot hsql and I got the results I was > sending you. What epsg number did the wkt that you use have? I have queried for EPSG:21781 (if my memory serve me right - the actual number should be in the "AUTHORITY" statement at the end of the WKT) us

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2216) jdbc-ng is not guaranteed to work with the JDBC 4.0 Specification

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Mueller (JIRA)
jdbc-ng is not guaranteed to work with the JDBC 4.0 Specification - Key: GEOT-2216 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2216 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Com

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2217) possible memory leak in GeoTiffReader

2008-12-11 Thread Brent (JIRA)
possible memory leak in GeoTiffReader - Key: GEOT-2217 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2217 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5.2, 2.4.4 Environment: linux 64-bit

[Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I've been looking at the directory data store again and the more I delve into it, the more I believe a rewrite is the only way to go. The current one tries to delegate to secondary data stores, relies on those datastore factories to implement a specific interface, does not support namespaces (

Re: [Geotools-devel] Better name for TXT Language

2008-12-11 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Thursday 11 December 2008 01:44:32 Jody Garnett wrote: > Mauricio Pazos wrote: > > I am with Andrea Aime proposal: "ECQL" > > That is cool - some reference to CQL is good ... CQL+ :-) > > That said we may wish to propose the FeatureID extensions to CQL as part > of the next revision of CSW speci

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Sounds like a good idea to me. Additional thoughts and comments inline. Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've been looking at the directory data store again and > the more I delve into it, the more I believe a rewrite > is the only way to go. > > The current one tries to delegate to secondary data stor

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Reopened: (GEOT-2182) Make SimplifyingFilterVisitor handle feature id validation

2008-12-11 Thread JIRA
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabriel Roldán reopened GEOT-2182: -- reopening sine a wrong assumption in JDBCFeatureSource that filter == preFilter makes the defect still ap

[Geotools-devel] Small Changes For Next Release of GPX2 Module

2008-12-11 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I've put together another release of the GPX 2 module with some small changes. Mostly house cleaning stuff. You can now download that JAR file with the library, the supporting docs, and the dependencies for the library from this page: http://www.redefinedhorizons.com/resources.html You'll note th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
> > The FileDataStoreSpi is badly designed for a number of reasons: > - it assumes you deal with certain extensions. This is overrated, the > datastore could operate by inspecting magic numbers in the file header > instead of using extensions > - it assumes you can create a datastore with a u

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2218) Add a unit test for arcsde NString reading and writing

2008-12-11 Thread JIRA
Add a unit test for arcsde NString reading and writing -- Key: GEOT-2218 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2218 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Test Components: data arcsde

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Reopened: (GEOT-2024) ArcSDE NStrings

2008-12-11 Thread JIRA
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabriel Roldán reopened GEOT-2024: -- > ArcSDE NStrings > --- > > Key: GEOT-2024 > URL: http://jira.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Better name for TXT Language

2008-12-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Mauricio Pazos ha scritto: > On Thursday 11 December 2008 01:44:32 Jody Garnett wrote: >> Mauricio Pazos wrote: >>> I am with Andrea Aime proposal: "ECQL" >> That is cool - some reference to CQL is good ... CQL+ :-) >> >> That said we may wish to propose the FeatureID extensions to CQL as part >> o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > >> >> The FileDataStoreSpi is badly designed for a number of reasons: >> - it assumes you deal with certain extensions. This is overrated, the >> datastore could operate by inspecting magic numbers in the file header >> instead of using extensions >> - it assume

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Sounds like a good idea to me. Additional thoughts and comments inline. > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been looking at the directory data store again and >> the more I delve into it, the more I believe a rewrite >> is the only way to go. >> >> The current one

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Can we hit a compromise of any kind so that something can be done > on 2.5.x? My enthusiasm on this directory datastore remake has > suddenly dropped below zero, as I've seen this movie already... Hum... datastore dispose wise I was probably thinking too much. If we have

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Andrea Aime wrote: > Andrea Aime ha scritto: > >> Can we hit a compromise of any kind so that something can be done >> on 2.5.x? My enthusiasm on this directory datastore remake has >> suddenly dropped below zero, as I've seen this movie already... > > Hum... datastore dispose wise I was probably

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rewriting the directory data store

2008-12-11 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've been looking at the directory data store again and > the more I delve into it, the more I believe a rewrite > is the only way to go. > Please just rewrite in place :-P > The current one tries to delegate to secondary data stores, > relies on those datastore factor