[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master #4837

See Changes: [Jody Garnett] correct parent pom reference -- [...truncated 14054 lines...] [INFO] ArcGrid datasource module . SUCCESS [40.802s] [INFO] ArcSDE plugin

Re: [Geotools-devel] geopkg build failure

Bah still fails - probably need a dependency on gt-jdbc :( -- Jody Garnett On Saturday, 20 July 2013 at 3:53 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Testing the 10-beta download … looks like geopackage needs some love: > > [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1] > [ERROR] > [ERROR]

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 9.4-beta to test

can anyone let me know what to try to build the installers? Ian On 20 July 2013 02:26, Jody Garnett wrote: > It appears a mac / windows installer was not yet created for 2.3.4 - I > am willing to test if a someone can generate. > > (Justin I know you provided email instructions on how to buil

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 9.4-beta to test

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ian Turton wrote: > can anyone let me know what to try to build the installers? > For the OSX installer you need a OSX machine, and for the Windows one, a windows machine. I believe the guide is still available here: http://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.0/developer/rele

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of PR #237

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Brett Walker wrote: > Just a bit more regarding this. > > ** ** > > I’m more interested in why a TreeSet was used for Objects that don’t > implement Comparable when a HashSet could have done. This implementation > detail is not immediately obvious. > By the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of PR #237

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Generally speaking, the comparator for those two treeset of Object there > should take care first of the case Comparable > against Comparable, and then try to do comparisons of date and number > ranges as a fallback. > If the contents of the se

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of PR #237

Hi Andrea, In the JIRA issue is a stack trace that caused the issue. It is my understanding that for a TreeSet that the elements are supposed to implement Comparable or you need to supply a Comparator. DateRange and NumericRange don't implement Comparable. I could be wrong here. Brett Sent f

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master #4838

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- See everything from the browser

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 9.4-beta to test

You can install NSIS compiler on linux or mac - that is how I build the uDig installer. Still if I can follow those instructions I will do so. -- Jody Garnett On Saturday, 20 July 2013 at 10:39 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ian Turton (mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com)>

Re: [Geotools-devel] geopkg build failure

Fixed the build, trying the full build cycle. If cite tests have run by the time I wake up I will release everything tomorrow morning. (Yes I should of just kicked geopkg out of the beta) -- Jody Garnett On Saturday, 20 July 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jody wrote: > Bah still fails - probably need

[Geotools-devel] happy fun ball

So the location tech migration is moving along fairly well for uDig, to the point where I have been submitting dependencies for review by the eclipse foundation. The review goes through the files (much like we did for OSGeo incubation) and in addition looks at the governance procedures around ac

Re: [Geotools-devel] happy fun ball

I found the original discussion during the original OSGeo incubation review: - http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/IP-Review-of-GeoTIFF-Happy-fun-Ball-td4314359.html original contribution: - http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-JAI-Request-for-comments-GeoTIFF-support-td4317251.html And perha

Re: [Geotools-devel] happy fun ball

Looks like some evidence of the author operating on the GDAL project in 2008, perhaps Frank knows him? - http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel/month=20080701/page=28 -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 12:52 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I found the original discussion during th

[Geotools-devel] 10-beta deployed and available for download

A couple of glitches when checking over the downloads, but no show stoppers. geotools-10-beta-project.zip - looks good builds fine etc… - README.html contains expected image geotools-10-beta-bin.zip - README.html <-- missing image - we are picking up a lot of size due to optional functionality

Re: [Geotools-devel] happy fun ball

Jody, I am afraid I don't have contact with this Mike. PS. Don't taunt Happy Fun Ball. On Jul 20, 2013 7:57 AM, "Jody Garnett" wrote: > Looks like some evidence of the author operating on the GDAL project in > 2008, perhaps Frank knows him? > - http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] happy fun ball

Hi Jody, I'm not sure of legal implication but could we remove the license altogether. It states in the license 'Pass it off as your own'. I think that removing this unusual license would fall under this allowance. Also it doesn't say that the Happy Fun Ball License must be retained as some mo