Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding external vector mask (footprint) support to GDAL plugin

Hi Jody, thanks for having setup a starting point. I have question since I think it's the first time that a set of classes is moved from a plugin module to a core one. Is there any convention/guidelines to follow up when setting up a proposal for this kind of "move-classes refactoring"? (see next

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5393) NullPointerException in GeometryCollectionHandler.endObject on empty geometries

Title: Message Title Julien Enselme create

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5394) XPath fails to retrieve gml:id if mapped as ClientProperty

Title: Message Title Stefano Costa created

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding external vector mask (footprint) support to GDAL plugin

Hi Jody, > thanks for having setup a starting point. > I have question since I think it's the first time that a set of classes is > moved from a plugin module to a core one. > > Is there any convention/guidelines to follow up when setting up a proposal > for this kind of "move-classes refactoring"

[Geotools-devel] can we close this proposal

G'Day Ian - would like to catch up with you on Extend Contrast Enhancement method handling in SLD and CSS . We have a couple outstanding tasks: 4. Documentation changes * API ch

[Geotools-devel] can I mark z-order proposal as complete

Can I mark the z-order proposa l as complete - it was marked as awating docs on our proposal page, but the latest gt-render docs on FeatureType style

Re: [Geotools-devel] Boundless YSLD to GeoTools?

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016, at 07:51 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 8:41 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: >> Wonder how you do your git-fu you do so well. > > Ha. git filter-branch… it’s amazing and scary all at the same time :) >> >> I will review and merge pull request with torben if

Re: [Geotools-devel] Improper Caching in ColorModelFactory

I created a pull request: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1154 The build appears to have failed due to an unrelated error in gt-xsd-wfs. Steve Ikeoka -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Improper-Caching-in-ColorModelFactory-tp5258720p5259254.html Sen

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5395) Build failure in gt-grib with -Dnetcdf.version 4.6.4 or later

Title: Message Title Ben Caradoc-Davies [A

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-grib and NetCDF-Java version

I have created a Jira issue for the build failure. [GEOT-5395] Build failure in gt-grib with -Dnetcdf.version 4.6.4 or later https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5395 Curiously, the error report is now different. I will try a full build from the top level and see if I can repeat. On 24/0

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5396) Incorrect General Oblique transform

Title: Message Title Ben Caradoc-Davies [A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Problem with General Oblique transform latitude?

Maciej, I have created a Jira issue for this problem: [GEOT-5396] Incorrect General Oblique transform https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5396 One other question: is General_Oblique the most appropriate name for this MapProjection? Although the implementation methods could be used be u

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-grib and NetCDF-Java version

A full build with -Dnetcdf.version=4.6.4 reproduces the earlier failure report. I have corrected the Jira issue. On 02/04/16 12:56, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Curiously, the error report is now different. I will try a full build > from the top level and see if I can repeat. -- Ben Caradoc-Davi