Re: [Geotools-devel] Migrate tests in gt-jdbc from JUnit3 to JUnit4

2022-05-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Stefan, personally I don't have objections, as long as the tests for all databases are still working after the migration. I believe Ben some years ago prepared an OnlineTest replacement JUnit4 .. here:

[Geotools-devel] Migrate tests in gt-jdbc from JUnit3 to JUnit4

2022-05-06 Thread Uhrig, Stefan via GeoTools-Devel
Hi all, I'd like to migrate the tests in gt-jdbc (and all derived tests) from JUnit3 to JUnit4 (or at least attempt it). Are there any objections against that? Background is that I'd like to enable parallel test execution for the HANA JDBC Plugin. That seems to work only for JUnit4 tests.

[Geotools-devel] 27.x branch started, build jobs will take a while to settle down

2022-05-06 Thread Jody Garnett
The 27.x branch now available. -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing gt-geojson and json-simple

2022-05-06 Thread Jody Garnett
When cutting main over to 28-SNAPSHOT a number of unsupported modules broke as they continued to depend on gt-geojsondatastore; I was able to fix everything except the gt-ogcapi client by referencing the new modules. For the timbering I have isolated gt-ogcapi into its own profile (not sure why