Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 19.1 release artifacts available for testing

I had a quick look at the apidocs and user docs. No problems noted. Brad -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Integrating App-Schema and Apache Solr

I was more thinking about this as an output format / representation of the complex feature. As a future consideration (if we ever had time) your work could be extended to automatically infer a mapping definition from the geopackage with related tables. Brad From: Nuno Oliveira Sent:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backport of HSQLDB upgrade to 2.4.1

It is possible that https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8491 is the same issue Brad -Original Message- From: Ben Caradoc-Davies Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2018 12:16 PM To: GeoTools Devel Subject: [Geotools-devel] Backport of HSQLDB upgrade to 2.4.1 I will be backporting the

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Integrating App-Schema and Apache Solr

Hi Nuno, I’m not sure if you’ve seen it, but there has been some work on adding related tables support to GeoPackage This is public at http://www.geopackage.org/18-000.html (or https://github.com/jyutzler/geopackage-related-tables which is basically the source code for the spec). If I

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools gt-metadata module does not build in master...

I tried this with a clean checkout of master on a windows box (which I don’t normally do, but for this test…). I’m not able to reproduce. My environment is slightly different in that I’m not using Eclipse, but rather building on Netbeans 8.2. I am definitely using a 64 bit Java 8 (C:\Program

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geopackage tests failing

I think we should always be running them, ideally with small local data sets. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 4:51 PM To: Geotools-Devel list Subject: [Geotools-devel] Geopackage tests failing Hi, the GeoPackage tests are currently failing in filtering. The

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools Continuous Integration Smell Report

that you have been already working on the branch "bradh-patch-1" for 4 weeks, while your feature branches are typically open for 3 days? You will find this and other interesting statistics about the CI practices in your project at https://carminevassallo.github.io/detectorsIcons/summari

Re: [Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday

Sorry, still a bit early in my time zone. Brad -Original Message- From: Ben Caradoc-Davies Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2018 7:08 AM To: Geotools-Devel list Subject: [Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on

[Geotools-devel] API/ABI change to move XMLTestSupport to test jar.

https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1986 is a proposal to remove xmlunit (and junit) as dependencies we ship in geotools. The reason why we were providing that is partly because some of the dependency definitions were not test scoped, and partly because we actually do depend on it, for

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

Looking at the history, epsg-oracle hasn’t been getting a lot of attention. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Monday, 9 July 2018 8:00 PM To: Geotools-Devel list Subject: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules Hi, I was looking at a Ian's pull request about supporting

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Codebase reformat using Google/AOSP format

+1 for the GeoServer part. For the avoidance of doubt, I’m positive for doing it on geotools and geowebcache, but I’m not voting for those. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2018 7:47 PM To: Geotools-Devel list

Re: [Geotools-devel] An issue when running the MapStyle demo

Just use layers(0) instead of getLayer(0). See http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/tutorial/map/style.html#creating-a -style-based-on-the-selection for an updated version of the tutorial. The old version assumes 2.7 (per pom.xml at the top of the page you linked to). HTH. Brad

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11 branch created

Understood on remaining compatible with JDK 8, but just did some forward looking because future JVMs may not support JDK 8 as a target. Brad ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] Dropping the spatialite store?

I have some legacy with the main spatialite project (sometime committer, good relationship with Sandro), so I’ll take a look. No promises, especially if the native code part is mixed, around supporting older versions of the data files. And not an offer to maintain – I also have a lot of

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11 branch created

access by org.opengis.util.CodeListTest (file:/home/bradh/geotools-jdk11/modules/library/opengis/target/test-classes/) to field java.util.ArrayList.elementData WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.opengis.util.CodeListTest WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable

Re: [Geotools-devel] Problem with commit for GEOT-6034

The JIRA ticket is important for it to get into the release notes. Its not hard to create one. It would have been good practice to include the analysis in the ticket (which is less likely to get lost than an email discussion). It probably isn't absolutely critical, but why not do it? You probably

Re: [Geotools-devel] Problem with commit for GEOT-6034

There is a developers' guide for GeoTools, and you can read a relevant part at http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/contribute.html Please let us know if anything is unclear after you've read through the guide. Brad -Original Message- From: Martin Zeller Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Dropping the spatialite store?

Lets see how much I can get done leading up to the RC (say by the end of the first week in January). If its still looking bad, we’ll demote it to community. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Monday, 12 November 2018 2:11 AM To: Brad Hards Cc: Geotools-Devel list Subject: Re:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Thinking about static analysis

I sent a PR for the PMD branch that adds the ruleset as a local file. Because the ruleset has to be an absolute path to work in the PMD maven plugin, you now have to run at least the “initialize” goal in maven, something like: mvn initialize pmd:check -Ppmd I took the default ruleset and

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Reminder: GeoTools/GeoServer meeting at 19:30 UTC tomorrow

Even if I could occasionally make 0630 (which will revert to 0530 once daylight savings ends here), I’m not really awake enough to contribute much. So optimise for those doing most of the work (hence needing most of the coordination), and I’ll do what I can to match that if I’m travelling.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Thinking about static analysis

+1: I’m always happy to have tools help me get things right. The other tool I’ve seen, but not tried yet, is Infer (https://fbinfer.com/) I had a look at the PMD branch, but it says “This branch is even with geotools:master.” – did you push? Brad

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageN update

ilding org.eclipse.imagen:imagen-core 0.4-SNAPSHOT [3/4] [INFO] [ jar ]- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ imagen-core --- [INFO] Deleting /home/bradh/imagen/modules/core/target [INFO]

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] (Cross post) Deprecation cleanup branches ready

Andrea, I tried to read the changes – its beyond me at the moment. I did build the geotools, geowebcache and geoserver branches locally (on ubuntu 1904 and openjdk11) and booted the resulting war file on tomcat9. Looks good. I can only express my gratitude for the lone geowolf effort,

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] April release train starting

PDF manual has right version and a lot of pages. Deployed the .war on tomcat9 on geoserver 19.04 with default JVM (openjdk 11.0.3). Restarted – runs up OK. Logged in, expected UI shows. Tasmania and NYC layer previews work OK. Spearfish layers show a ServiceException