> ...So the tradeoff is on limiting what we can handle with an pleassant API,
or
> end up allowing anything like a DOM and deal with the mess it supposes.
or well the metadata meta-model should be quite the same as for FeatureType,
as it seems to follows the principles?
-
Problem is I'm scared about the lack of requirements (or should I say the
blurry ones) for a metatada client.
Explanation: it would be pretty easy to build one that works over well defined
information schemas (dublin core, 19115/191139).
My temptation (and what I'm doing at the server side on my
Am Freitag, 22. Dezember 2006 22:48 schrieb Jody Garnett:
> I keep trying to build one :-)
>
> Deegree has some code, I was not able to get it to work at the time.
> GeoAPI has had some donated interfaces for a while, but Gabriel is
> finally putting them on their feet with a parser etc.
>
> I woul
I keep trying to build one :-)
Deegree has some code, I was not able to get it to work at the time.
GeoAPI has had some donated interfaces for a while, but Gabriel is
finally putting them on their feet with a parser etc.
I would talk to Gabriel and propose a collaboration :-)
Jody
> Hi,
>
> thi
