Harald Welte has abandoned this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Abandoned
no progress since september on a trivial change for obscure operating syst
Harald Welte has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1:
any interest in reworking this as suggested?
--
To view, vi
Harald Welte has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1:
Actually, I think this ultimately belongs into autoconf:
#
Harald Welte has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1:
or well, it is actually, if we are about to pass that path in
Harald Welte has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1:
slightly off-topic: PATH_MAX doesn't seem to be such a great
Vadim Yanitskiy has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/
Pau Espin Pedrol has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1:
Have a look at ./include/osmocom/core/timer_compat.h, we
Pau Espin Pedrol has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202 )
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
We probably use PATH_MAX in several places,
Thorsten Alteholz has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9202
Change subject: use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
..
use reasonable value if PATH_MAX is not defined
In case PATH_MAX is no
