On 28/02/17 22:44, Tony Quinn wrote:
On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote:
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
He does come across as a truly vile individuial, it has to be said; but
it's often the case with
On 28/02/17 22:30, CJB wrote:
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote:
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote:
> On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>>> has content
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
has content which should be discussed.
It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not
appropriate to post links to that site.
Find it in credible news media or don't link to it at
Whatever your politics or personal standards on decency, lies are lies.
Wikipedia banned citations to Daily Mail for good reasons.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website
"The editors described the arguments for a ban as
The daily mail, self admitting to all things hateful, causes a lot of
the issues surrounding decency, race, and morality. Save yourself from
the exposure of such repugnance if you use Chrome try this:
6 matches
Mail list logo