Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread michael norman
On 28/02/17 22:44, Tony Quinn wrote: On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote: I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled email I first received from that David person. CJB. He does come across as a truly vile individuial, it has to be said; but it's often the case with

Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread michael norman
On 28/02/17 22:30, CJB wrote: I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled email I first received from that David person. CJB. On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote: On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony

Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread CJB
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled email I first received from that David person. CJB. On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote: > On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote: >>> has content

Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread Steve B
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote: has content which should be discussed. It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not appropriate to post links to that site. Find it in credible news media or don't link to it at

Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread VeniVidiVideo
Whatever your politics or personal standards on decency, lies are lies. Wikipedia banned citations to Daily Mail for good reasons. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website "The editors described the arguments for a ban as

Re: BBC Licensing Expose

2017-02-28 Thread Dennis Smith
The daily mail, self admitting to all things hateful, causes a lot of the issues surrounding decency, race, and morality. Save yourself from the exposure of such repugnance if you use Chrome try this: