Alejandro may want to comment…
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Artem
Pelenitsyn
Sent: 26 February 2018 17:05
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Guarded Impredicativity implementation
Dear ghc-devs,
Is there any work has been done on the latest (ttbomk) proposal
On 26/02/2018 19:19, Ben Gamari wrote:
Sylvain Henry writes:
On 25/02/2018 21:30, Ben Gamari wrote:
Hmm, I'm afraid that's not particularly illuminating.
It would be helpful to see the output from -ddump-if-trace as this will
tell you why GHC is trying to load this
Sylvain Henry writes:
> On 25/02/2018 21:30, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> Hmm, I'm afraid that's not particularly illuminating.
>>
>> It would be helpful to see the output from -ddump-if-trace as this will
>> tell you why GHC is trying to load this interface file.
>
> Thanks, it has
Dear ghc-devs,
Is there any work has been done on the latest (ttbomk) proposal for
impredicative types in Haskell:
> Guarded impredicative polymorphism by Alejandro Serrano, Jurriaan Hage,
Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Simon Peyton Jones
On 25/02/2018 21:30, Ben Gamari wrote:
Hmm, I'm afraid that's not particularly illuminating.
It would be helpful to see the output from -ddump-if-trace as this will
tell you why GHC is trying to load this interface file.
Thanks, it has been helpful. The relevant trace is:
Need decl for
Vincent Hanquez writes:
> On 25/02/18 17:42, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> The GHC development team is pleased to announce the first (and likely
>> final) release candidate of GHC 8.4.1. The usual release artifacts are
>> available from
>>
>>
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes:
> This is a reduction => good!
>
> "Bump" is usually bad.
>
Mmm, fair point. I'll use a more precise wording in the future.
Cheers,
- Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On 25/02/18 17:42, Ben Gamari wrote:
The GHC development team is pleased to announce the first (and likely
final) release candidate of GHC 8.4.1. The usual release artifacts are
available from
https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.4.1-rc1
Hi Ben,
Looks like both SHA1SUM and SHA256SUM are
This is a reduction => good!
"Bump" is usually bad.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-commits [mailto:ghc-commits-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf
| Of g...@git.haskell.org
| Sent: 25 February 2018 21:58
| To: ghc-comm...@haskell.org
| Subject: [commit: ghc] master: