Re: stranal/sigs/UnsatFun

Richard Eisenberg writes: > Hi devs, > > On my kind=type branch (D808), I have this test failure for > stranal/sigs/UnsatFun: > Hmmm. I was curious and so took the opportunity to do a bit of digging. This likely isn't helpful but you never know... > -UnsatFun.g: b

What is causing the "Unrecognized field abi" warning?

This shows up in more recent builds of my packages on Travis CI, e.g. https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGL/jobs/93814917#L296, but I don't have a clue what's causing it (GHC? cabal? Something else?), if I should ignore it or if I should somehow act on that. :-/ My gut feeling is that it's

Re: stranal/sigs/UnsatFun

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 29.11.2015, 10:42 -0500 schrieb Richard Eisenberg: > On my kind=type branch (D808), I have this test failure for > stranal/sigs/UnsatFun: > > Strictness signatures >  UnsatFun.$trModule: m >  UnsatFun.f: b >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 7.10.3 release candidate 3

Jens Petersen writes: > On 18 November 2015 at 23:48, Ben Gamari wrote: >> We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of GHC 7.10.3: > > Thanks, I built it for Fedora and RHEL/CentOS 7 in my copr repo: > Thanks Jens! On that note, 7.10.3

Re: Remove deprecated quasiquote syntax

Done in https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1530. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > I'm all for it, if the broader community (e.g. the developers of those > packages) are ok. > > Simon > > | -Original Message- > | From: ghc-devs

Re: stranal/sigs/UnsatFun

These responses are helpful, thanks. Is there a primer for how to read the output? Or a small function that produces the output that I could quickly reverse engineer? There is a suggestion to look at the core before and after my patch. Is there a certain phase I should look at? What should I

Re: What is causing the "Unrecognized field abi" warning?

2015-11-29 21:42 GMT+01:00 Edward Z. Yang : > [...] If the messages are bothersome, we could setup Cabal to not print out > fields if it knows that GHC doesn't support them. > I would very much appreciate that, especially given the fact that "old versions of GHC" include GHC HEAD