Carter Schonwald writes:
> For what it’s worth, I’ve never found phab / arc to be the bottle neck /
> actual time consuming piece of doing anything for ghc
>
> It’s defintely the nicest code review substrate I’ve engaged with
>
> One question I have : how does the llvm org manage / handle their
For what it’s worth, I’ve never found phab / arc to be the bottle neck /
actual time consuming piece of doing anything for ghc
It’s defintely the nicest code review substrate I’ve engaged with
One question I have : how does the llvm org manage / handle their
phabricator instance and or ci
To put my 2¢ – I will be happy with whatever service provides the most
reliable CI.
In terms of workflow, I like Ben's suggestion:
* Consider a PR to be a stack of differentials, with each commit
being an atomic change in that stack.
___
ghc-devs
Michal Terepeta writes:
> Hope you don't mind if I add an opinion of a small/occasional
> contributor to the thread.
>
> Personally, I would prefer a move to GitHub. Mostly due to familiarity
> and network effect (pretty much everyone is on GitHub).
>
> But I would also consider a move to GitLab
"Boespflug, Mathieu" writes:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 18:47, Ben Gamari wrote:
...
>
> The important things are: reducing the maintenance burden (by
> preferring hosted solutions) while still meeting developer
> requirements and supporting a workflow that is familiar to most.
>
Hello Yotam,
Could you please report this as a bug on GHC Trac?
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReportABug
I couldn’t quickly reproduce your issue, however, I run into another seemingly
unrelated problem.
P.S.: Note that build instructions in my blog post got slightly out of date
after
Hi,
I'm trying to build with hadrian (
https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/andreymokhov/building-ghc-on-windows/)
I get an error when running: stack exec hadrian -- --directory ".." -j
--flavour=quickest --configure
md5sum: 'standard input': no properly formatted MD5 checksum lines found
ERROR:
Hope you don't mind if I add an opinion of a small/occasional
contributor to the thread.
Personally, I would prefer a move to GitHub. Mostly due to familiarity
and network effect (pretty much everyone is on GitHub).
But I would also consider a move to GitLab a big improvement over the
current
Travis Whitaker writes:
> Hello GHC Devs,
>
> I'm working on a very tiny patch for GHC. The patch concerns the LLVM code
> generator, and I'd like to run the validate script. ./validate ignores mk/
> build.mk (which is probably correct) and it doesn't seem to be using the
> LLVM backend. LLVM
