Re: Linking stage 2 compiler with non-threaded RTS using Make?
There are some hidden dependencies, in particular ghci requires GhcThreaded last I checked (and ghci == ghc --interactive, not a separate program that could be linked threaded). You may also have to disable the entire bytecode backend, which would take TH and runghc with it as well as ghci. On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:02 AM Ömer Sinan Ağacan wrote: > Anyone know how to link stage 2 with non-threaded RTS using Make build > system? > There's a variable GhcThreaded, but setting it "NO" makes no difference, > stage 2 > compiler is still threaded. > > So far the only way I could find is to redirect build system output to a > file, > find the step that linked ghc-stage2, repeat that command but without > -threaded. > It's really painful as I have to repeat this step after every rebuild. > > Any tips? > > Thanks, > > Ömer > ___ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > -- brandon s allbery kf8nh allber...@gmail.com ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Linking stage 2 compiler with non-threaded RTS using Make?
Anyone know how to link stage 2 with non-threaded RTS using Make build system? There's a variable GhcThreaded, but setting it "NO" makes no difference, stage 2 compiler is still threaded. So far the only way I could find is to redirect build system output to a file, find the step that linked ghc-stage2, repeat that command but without -threaded. It's really painful as I have to repeat this step after every rebuild. Any tips? Thanks, Ömer ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Re: Extension.hs ForallXXX constraints
Somehow, I remember this conversation coming up recently, and I thought it was decided to remove these. Indeed, I'm surprised they're still around. Strike them down! Thanks, Richard > On Jan 8, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Alan & Kim Zimmerman wrote: > > I have got back into some GHC dev, and noticed that the various ForallXXX > type synonyms in Extension.hs are unused in GHC. > > In the early iteration, they were needed, but it seems not any more. > > Is there any reason they should not be removed? > > Alan > ___ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
