Hi Nicolas,
I apologize if you didn't get the notice I sent last week on the update.
Right now I am endlessly battling windows, and while I actually DO
have a dynamic GHC working for windows with the DLL split (#5987,) it
is segfaulting in the stage2 compiler when compiling the 'time'
library,
What are ways for other folks to help? (If possible)
On Friday, November 15, 2013, Austin Seipp wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
I apologize if you didn't get the notice I sent last week on the update.
Right now I am endlessly battling windows, and while I actually DO
have a dynamic GHC working for
I added a note about the parallel IO manager status to
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-7.8. There are two issues
I'd still like to resolve. Is there a target date for the release?
-Andi
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Andreas Voellmy
andreas.voel...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, the
Unless I missed an RC announcement, I'm pretty sure we're running a little
behind the schedule from that email.
Deciders, has the Nov 25 target slid back? Any new estimates, if so?
Thanks much.
On Nov 14, 2013 9:40 PM, Andreas Voellmy andreas.voel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at
Thanks for the reminder. Wiki is updated; atomics branch is merged. The
only further work I plan to do in the near term is add additional tests.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
Friends
The 7.8 release is imminent. This email is to ask
); David Luposchainsky; ghc-
| d...@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
|
|
| On 4 Sep 2013, at 15:52, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com
| wrote:
|
| Edsko/Thomas/Luite: if you want anything for 7.8 it'll have to be
| jolly soon. At the moment I don't even know the motivation
Thank you Ryan!
I'll be getting my ARMv7 build machine back online today, hopefully.
Jens Peterson reported he had a working ARMv7 build to me today from
HEAD, which is good news.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Ryan Newton rrnew...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. Wiki is updated;
Friends
The 7.8 release is imminent. This email is to ask abou the status of your
contributions. In each case could you update the wiki with the current state
of play, and your intentions, including dates. That is, don't put your reply
in email: it on the status page below; though by all
By the way, the parallel IO manager is also new in 7.8 right? I'm not sure
but I think it may have something to do with the excessive system time bug
I just filed:
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8224
___
ghc-devs mailing list
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
- Nov 1st: Cut branch, and I plan on making a 7.8 RC1 available the
same day, for several platforms.
Hi, Austin -
Thanks for writing this up.
One of the factors that's blocking my ability to build Hackage packages is
Indeed. There's a few straggling things but overall we're in feature
freeze overall right now, right?
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan
b...@serpentine.comjavascript:;
wrote:
One of the factors that's blocking my ability to
Friends,
After talking with Simon yesterday, we have some idea of how the
release will go. As I'm sure you're aware, the release is winding down
rather quickly, and it will be a fantastic one hopefully :)
Now that all the features have landed, we're going into bugfixing
mode. The schedule is,
else seems to mind either way) then go
ahead.
Simon
From: Luite Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 08:37
To: Edsko de Vries
Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; ghc-devs; Edsko de Vries
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
Edsko has done some work of rearranging
to document some these loops too.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Edsko de Vries [mailto:edskodevr...@gmail.com]
| Sent: 11 September 2013 15:33
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: Luite Stegeman; ghc-devs; Edsko de Vries
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
|
| Hi all,
|
| So I managed
2013 22:04
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Thomas Schilling; Edsko de Vries; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
· Why aren’t you using Data.Dynamic for the hook things? You are
precisely doing dynamic typing after all. (Moreover I want to change
Data.Dynamic so
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 08:37
To: Edsko de Vries
Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; ghc-devs; Edsko de Vries
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
Edsko has done some work of rearranging imports in DynFlags to make the DLL
split work, and I've implemented the hooks on top of this, in a record
interested parties, work together to evolve a design that everyone
is happy with.
Does that sound ok?
Simon
From: Luite Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 September 2013 22:04
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Thomas Schilling; Edsko de Vries; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8
-devs
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
* Why aren't you using Data.Dynamic for the hook things? You are
precisely doing dynamic typing after all. (Moreover I want to change
Data.Dynamic so that it says
data Dynamic where
Dyn :: Typeable a = a - Dynamic
and you want
· **Why aren’t you using Data.Dynamic for the hook things? You are
precisely doing dynamic typing after all. (Moreover I want to change
Data.Dynamic so that it says
data Dynamic where
Dyn :: Typeable a = a - Dynamic
and you want to take advantage of this.
Ah the goal
Diatchki
iavor.diatc...@gmail.commailto:iavor.diatc...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.commailto:simo...@microsoft.com
Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:52 AM
Subject: GHC 7.8 release status
To: Nicolas Frisby nicolas.fri
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
|
|
| On 4 Sep 2013, at 15:52, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com
| wrote:
|
| Edsko/Thomas/Luite: if you want anything for 7.8 it'll have to be
| jolly soon. At the moment I don't even know the motivation or design,
| let alone
21 matches
Mail list logo
