Perf improvement

I'm seeing this in validate bytes allocated value is too low: (If this is because you have improved GHC, please update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated: 56782344 +/-7% Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52807579 Upper

RE: ./validate --slow results

Wow... 97 unexpected failures is bad. Ben/David/someone else: might you investigate/characterise them? Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Bartosz | Nitka | Sent: 14 September 2017 13:57 | To: ghc-devs Devs

Re: Perf improvement

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I'm seeing this in validate > > bytes allocated value is too low: > > (If this is because you have improved GHC, please > > update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) > > ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated:

Re: Perf improvement

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > I'm seeing this in validate > > bytes allocated value is too low: > > (If this is because you have improved GHC, please > > update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) > > ExpectedT5837(normal) bytes allocated:

RE: Perf improvement

Bump it down, maybe... it got /better/! | -Original Message- | From: Ben Gamari [mailto:b...@smart-cactus.org] | Sent: 14 September 2017 16:54 | To: Simon Peyton Jones ; ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Perf improvement | | Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs

RE: ./validate --slow results

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs writes: > Wow... 97 unexpected failures is bad. > > Ben/David/someone else: might you investigate/characterise them? > I periodically run --slow and have opened a number of tickets in response in the past (#11819 being the one I was able to

Re: Phab: conditional approval

Yes, this works for me. As for merging, I'm always very grateful when Ben does it -- though I agree that it would make more sense for me to do it when I can test-then-merge. Thanks, Richard > On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Simon Marlow

Re: A type checker plugin for row types

Here are my stabs at answers to two of your questions. > • When/where exactly do Derived constraints arise? I'm not recognizing them > in the OutsideIn paper. I agree with others' comments on this point, but perhaps I can expand. A Derived constraint is essentially a Wanted constraint, but one

Re: Phab: conditional approval

William Casarin recently tweeted a link to the bitcoincore devs ACK system[1], which are Concept ACK - Agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't reviewed the code changes or tested them. utACK (untested ACK) - Reviewed and agree with the code changes but haven't actually tested