with the GNAT_LARGS argument for the Makefile and -gnatwa I can build until the
linker starts its work:
gnatlink ghdl_mcode.ali -g memsegs_c.o chkstk.o -Wl,-no_compact_unwind i386.o
linux.o times.o grt-cbinding.o grt-cvpi.o
ld: warning: can't find atom for N_GSYM stabs
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 11:58 +0100, Torsten Meißner wrote:
with the GNAT_LARGS argument for the Makefile and -gnatwa I can build until
the linker starts its work:
gnatlink ghdl_mcode.ali -g memsegs_c.o chkstk.o -Wl,-no_compact_unwind i386.o
linux.o times.o grt-cbinding.o grt-cvpi.o
ld:
I take gnat 4.3 because with the first try with GNAT 2013 GPL I've got an error
directly after the beginning of building:
TMs-Air:ghdldrv torsten$ /usr/bin/make target=i686-darwin
GNAT_LARGS=-Wl,-no_compact_unwind
gcc -c -g -DWITH_GNAT_RUN_TIME -o i386.o ../grt/config/i386.S
On 28 Dec 2013, at 11:03 am, Brian Drummond br...@shapes.demon.co.uk wrote:
Thanks for the corrections - the important thing is, Torsten has a
result.
- Brian
I thought about calling you Brain again, but bit my tongue.
___
Ghdl-discuss mailing
On 28 Dec 2013, at 10:07 am, Torsten Meißner tors...@meissneronline.net wrote:
Yeah, installing the ada-4.4 version from the corrected link fixed my
problems.
Thanks for your help, i really appreciate :)
As soon as I saw that darwin8 I knew it was my fault. It didn't help someone
built
Am 28.12.2013 um 00:23 schrieb David Koontz diogra...@gmail.com:
On 28 Dec 2013, at 10:07 am, Torsten Meißner tors...@meissneronline.net
wrote:
Yeah, installing the ada-4.4 version from the corrected link fixed my
problems.
Thanks for your help, i really appreciate :)
As soon as I
Hello,
On 27 Dec 2013, at 2:46 am, Torsten Meißner
tors...@meissneronline.net wrote:
default_pathes.ads:29:80: (style) this line is too long
gnatmake: default_pathes.ads compilation error
make: *** [ghdl_mcode] Error 4
Maybe this can be workaround by building ghdl in a shorter
Hello,
On 23 Dec 2013, at 8:40 pm, tging...@free.fr wrote:
I think that ghdl is compliant with VHDL 1993 and 2002. That's
modulo
bugs, but I think that all features are implemented. If not, do
not
hesitate to raise issues.
The issue isn't features (syntax), it's compliance
