Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Muting a specific assert/warning

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:19:08 +0100 Tristan Gingold wrote: > > Is it somehow possible to tell ghld, "yes, i know there is something > > not ok, but please just stop this one assert from file X at line Y" ? > > If possible without disabling all others. > > Not exactly but what

[Ghdl-discuss] Bug in array signal asignment (was: Muting a specific assert/warning)

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:23:41 +0100 Attila Kinali wrote: > BTW: that bug is kind of puzzling me, i cannot see the error in my code. Ok. I think this is a bug in ghdl. Attached is a file that demonstrates it. I run it with: ghdl -i --std=08 ctrl_algo.vhd && ghdl -m --std=08

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Bug in array signal asignment

On 27/11/15 01:31, David Koontz wrote: On 27/11/2015, at 11:47 am, Attila Kinali > wrote: It seems like there is some strange interaction between the TDC_BUF process and its for loops and the TDCSIGNAL generate statement at the bottom. Longest

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Bug in array signal asignment

> On 27/11/2015, at 4:43 pm, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > I would simply add that this is one of vhdl pitfall. VHDL behaviour > is not very intuitive. > > This could be detected at elaboration time by using std_ulogic instead of > std_logic. > > (You'd better to always use

[Ghdl-discuss] Muting a specific assert/warning

Moin, I just build myself a larger testbench that takes larger array of randomly generated real values and casts them into an sfixed. For obvious reasons i get this warning: ../../src/ieee2008/fixed_generic_pkg-body.vhdl:2546:9:@57675ps:(assertion warning):

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] GHDL from Source on Slackware 14.1 32-bit

On 26/11/15 11:28, Simon Thijs de Feber wrote: Currently I am building ghdl with Slackware-current 32-bit version. This release has native gcc @ 4.9.3 Using the build script from sourceforge. All works fine except for the ghdl-install itself. Can fix it by copying the required files. Great.

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Muting a specific assert/warning

On 26/11/15 18:41, Attila Kinali wrote: Moin, I just build myself a larger testbench that takes larger array of randomly generated real values and casts them into an sfixed. For obvious reasons i get this warning: ../../src/ieee2008/fixed_generic_pkg-body.vhdl:2546:9:@57675ps:(assertion

Re: [Ghdl-discuss] integer range

On 26/11/15 08:08, KIMURA Masaru wrote: FYI, and you may know, but i've not tested actually, some closed source VHDL simulators (such as Aldec Riviera-PRO) have relax options (e.g. integer range), IIRC. Never heard about that. Any pointer or detail about this feature would be useful. e.g.