See addendum at bottom.
On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:14 PM, David Koontz wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
While technically challenging, a rather dry subject.
Getting to the actual error:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
Second,
On 01/08/2012 12:06 AM, David Koontz wrote:
...
The SDF file says 3.0 compatibility (VITAL2000), but ghdl doesn't except
comments in an SDF file (I tried), so I imagine it's only Vital-95 compliant
(SDF 2.1).
Hello David,
the sdf 3.0 specification states
Comments can be placed in SDF
On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:49 AM, Walter F.J. Mueller wrote:
From all that I conclude that the sdf parser in ghdl seems to have
some problems with the proper treatment of RNUMBER and rtriple and
seems to require rtriple's even though the SDF spec clearly does not
require that.
I haven't generated
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
While technically challenging, a rather dry subject.
Getting to the actual error:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
Second,
test_timesim.vhd:133:3:warning: component instance clk_bufgp_bufg is not
bound
Is going to
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
While technically challenging, a rather dry subject.
Getting to the actual error:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 PM, David Koontz wrote:
Second,
test_timesim.vhd:133:3:warning: component instance clk_bufgp_bufg is not
bound
Is going to
Hallo,
picking up on the recent thread 'postfitting timing simulation with XIlinx'
a few remarks on using ghdl together with the Xilinx ISE tool chain:
- Building Xilinx unisim and simprim for ghdl
The Xilinx unisim and simprim libraries 'mostly' compile, over the
years there were always
On Jan 6, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Walter F.J. Mueller wrote:
on ghdl-discuss in July 2007. Unfortunately all written there still
holds, one gets an error like
tb_x:error: x_tsim.sdf:9:16: ':' (colon) expected
and ghdl aborts. ghdl doesn't accept the sdf files generated by the ISE
tool