Hi,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
> >Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
> >would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
>
> I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
> any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projec
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
> From the magic number (255), this looks to me
> like a bug in the thumbnail creation code -- possibly an artificial
> limit that's getting exceeded without warning.
>
> Is this known, or should I hit bugzilla?
It doesn't ring any bells, and I think it would...
Owen wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:21:50 +0100
> Niklas Mattisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics/
> > http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics2/
>
> I think they are excellent. maybe you should advise in
> comp.graphics.apps.gimp also
And perhaps Rom
Hi,
"Jakub Friedl (listy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so 2.2 will be gegl based?
That hasn't been decided yet. Perhaps we will start to use some GEGL
functionality in 2.2 already but don't expect any user-visible changes
due to this.
Sven
___
Gimp
six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.
Sven
so 2.2 will be gegl based?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp.
> > It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
>
> I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has
> made any specific plans.
We did indeed make ver
Hi,
Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gimp-2.0pre2: I had a directory with 906 images in it but no up-to-date
> thumbnails, so I selected all (Ctl-A) in the Files list and clicked on
> the thumbnail pane to create the thumbs. It began working away, but
> stalled at image 255 or 906.
