Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp usability tests

2004-04-09 Thread Michael Schumacher
Carol Spears wrote: On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:15:41PM +0200, Roman Joost wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote: can someone please make a fair test, just once? What will be a fair test in your mind? a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp usability tests

2004-04-09 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote: > V ?t 08. 04. 2004 v 06:35 -0700 p??e Carol Spears: > > > > TheGIMP is not photoshop. it was written so that linux people would not > > not have to use a different operating system and/or steal. > i am quoting spencer with my own r

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp usability tests

2004-04-09 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:57:17AM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Carol Spears writes: > > TheGIMP is not photoshop. it was written so that linux people would not > > not have to use a different operating system > > Was it? GIMP was originally written on the commercial Unixes of the > time (Sol

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp usability tests

2004-04-09 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:15:41PM +0200, Roman Joost wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote: > > > can someone please make a fair test, just once? > What will be a fair test in your mind? > a test

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch: binary relocatability support for Gimp

2004-04-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Hongli Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Win32, Gimp is relocatable. It can find out it's own path at > runtime and find out where it's data files are. On Linux, all paths in > Gimp are hardcoded at compile time. This means the app is not > relocatable. > > I work for the autopackage proj

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp usability tests

2004-04-09 Thread Roman Joost
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote: > > > > I think it would also be interesting to see how more experienced GIMP > > users handle the software - but for an initial feedback new users are > > more revealing

[Gimp-developer] Re: [gimpwin-users] Updated Gimp 2.0.0 installer available

2004-04-09 Thread Branko Collin
On 8 Apr 2004, at 8:54, Jernej Simon+AQ0-i+AQ0- wrote: > I uploaded a revised version of the installer, which now includes the > help files and gimp-freetype plug-in. This installer will also check > for possible DLL conflicts and offer you an option to rename the > conflicting files. > > As usu