On 6/7/06, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 12:25 pm, Dave Neary wrote:
Let's put it in these terms:
Pippin?
can that stuff run a washed out GIMP or Horizon? What do you think
about matching it against the 770?
Stripping down/reorganizing GIMPs user
(Delurk: I'm a sporadic developer of plugins, some of which are almost
good enough to shove in the registry, and I've watched this list for a
few months)
One of my current projects is a multifrequency blend tool (inspired
by, but not based on, the enblend program), and as part of its
operation,
On 6/7/06, Toby Speight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Delurk: I'm a sporadic developer of plugins, some of which are almost
good enough to shove in the registry, and I've watched this list for a
few months)
One of my current projects is a multifrequency blend tool (inspired
by, but not based on,
0 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
0 Nathan Summers URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan) wrote:
Nathan Cancelling a plugin kills it unconditionally. It's been a
Nathan few months since I looked at that code, but I'm fairly sure
Nathan that there is no way for a plug-in to catch that it's been
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote:
While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no
chance to clear up if it's killed outright,
Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up before it exits.
so what happens to e.g. undo stack in this case?
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 19:54 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote:
While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no
chance to clear up if it's killed outright,
Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up
