> (define blur-file "blur.png")
> (define blur-file "otherblur.png")
>
> Different versions of Scheme handle this differently. I do not know if this is
> proper Gimp-scheme (re-defining a defined variable), or if one would have to
> use set! for the second definition/assignment. Incidently, no scri
> (define (blur-file) (set! return "blur.png"))
>
> but that would not (really?) allow constructs like:
>
> file_for_blur: blur.png
> file_for_blur: blur_changed_my_mind_use_this_instead_but_keep_other_too.png
> file_for_blur: use_yet_another.png
You mean like (define blur-file "blur.png")?
> Mor
I wrote a small but useful script that will scale an image to best fit
within a constrained size without affecting aspect ratio. It's a simple
script, but I've found it quite useful as a component for other scripts,
and thought it might be useful in GIMP at large. It's scheme right now,
but I cou
> I already explained most of my suggestions to Joao.
> I did another design, available at
> http://www.zeitgeistmedia.net/gimp/gimpstreamline2.png
that's REALLY nice looking, and I like it, not that my opinion counts for
much :)
Jon
___
Gimp-developer
