On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:01:13PM +1030, David Gowers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:17 AM, James Cox jay...@gimp.org wrote:
result = floor(input * opacity + g_random_double());
If you pregenerate a lookup table (say 256 entries), keep a counter
which cycles
--
Christopher Howard
http://indicium.us
http://theologia.indicium.us
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Cox wrote:
On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:22 -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
Though having a far
Christopher Howard wrote:
Jay Cox wrote:
On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:22 -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
Though having a far from sufficient understanding of how the GIMP brush
painting process works, it seems to me like this is the
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:17 AM, James Cox jay...@gimp.org wrote:
Christopher Howard wrote:
Thinking about this some more, the error diffusion is probably not even
necessary. You should be able to get by with some random dithering like
the following (if it wasn't slower than molasses):
On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:22 -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
Though having a far from sufficient understanding of how the GIMP
brush
painting process works, it seems to me like this is the fundamental
problem: In making
Hi. To try to learn GIMP development, I have been looking into old bug
#588681 (Airbrush tool produces banding with with soft brush). From the
initial problem summary:
The Airbrush produces bandings when its used with a soft brush and low
pressure. The sharp edges in the bands is [sic] very
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:22 -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
Though having a far from sufficient understanding of how the GIMP brush
painting process works, it seems to me like this is the fundamental
problem: In making black-and-white brushes semi-transparent, GIMP
somehow levels out
